Quantum Shifts: The Societal Implications of Quantum Computing on Security, Privacy, and the Economy

Mary Christine Wheatley
Wheatley Research Consultancy, Bagley, Minnesota, USA
Correspondence to: mchristinewheatley@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJCS.100002

Additional information

• Ethical approval: N/a
• Consent: N/a
• Funding: No industry funding
• Conflicts of interest: N/a
• Author contribution: Mary Christine Wheatley – Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, review and editing
• Guarantor: Mary Christine Wheatley
• Provenance and peer-review:
  Commissioned and externally peer-reviewed
• Data availability statement: N/a

Keywords: Quantum computing, Data security, Quantum- resistant cryptography, Surveillance, Economic impact.

Peer Review
Received: 17 September 2024
Accepted: 17 October 2024
Published: 6 November 2024

Introduction

Quantum computing emerges as one of the most groundbreaking advancements in the field of computation, harnessing the peculiar properties of quantum mechanics to process information in fundamentally novel ways. Unlike classical computers, which use bits as the smallest unit of data, quantum computers use quantum bits or qubits, which can exist simultaneously in multiple states.^1,2 This allows quantum machines to perform large-scale computations more efficiently, solving tasks that are currently infeasible for conventional systems. The potential of quantum computing extends beyond sheer processing power, poised to disrupt various sectors by enabling complex simulations in quantum chemistry, optimization for logistics, financial modeling, artificial intelligence, and more. However, its most profound implications may well be felt in the realms of data security, privacy, and the overarching economic structures.

This review will focus specifically on these societal implications, highlighting the dual nature of quantum computing both as a potential enabler of security breaches, through its ability to break classical encryption methods, and as a catalyst for security innovation, through the development of quantum-resistant cryptographic systems.³ Furthermore, it will explore the impact of quantum technologies on privacy, considering the new challenges that arise in protecting personal information in a postquantum world. Finally, the review will discuss the economic transformations expected as quantum computing becomes mainstream, influencing industries and reshaping global economic landscapes.⁴ The objective is to provide a thorough analysis of how these transformative technologies intersect with societal needs and concerns, underpinning the necessity for informed policy frameworks and ethical considerations as we advance into the quantum age.

Quantum Computing Basics

Foundations of Quantum Computing: Understanding Superposition and Entanglement

Quantum computing harnesses the perplexing yet profound principles of quantum mechanics to perform computations that are far beyond the scope of classical computers. The concepts of superposition and entanglement are central to this technology. Superposition allowaezoretical improvement; it enables practical applications such as saimulating complex chemical reactions and optimizing large systems more efficiently than traditional computing methods.⁵ Entanglement, another quantum phenomenon, involves a pair or group of particles in a state where the quantum state of each particle cannot be described independently of the state of the others, even when the particles are separated by large distances. This principle is pivotal for quantum computing, particularly in enhancing the interconnectedness of qubits across quantum systems, thus enabling faster and more secure communication protocols than those possible with classical systems. The practical upshots of entanglement include the potential for creating more secure communication channels and faster problem-solving algorithms that are impervious to conventional hacking techniques.^6,7 These foundational principles signify a paradigm shift in computational power, with quantum computers poised to tackle problems that choke conventional supercomputers, such as integer factorization, which underpins much of modern cryptography, and complex optimization problems in logistics and resource management.⁸

Current State of Quantum Computing Technology

Quantum computing has rapidly evolved from ­theoretical constructs to operational technologies, demonstrating capabilities that far surpass traditional computing systems. This transition is underpinned by the properties of quantum bits, or qubits, which, unlike classical bits that encode information as either 0 or 1, can exist in multiple states simultaneously, thanks to superposition.9 Google’s quantum computer, Sycamore, exemplifies these advancements, achieving quantum supremacy by performing a complex computation in mere seconds—a task that would take the best classical supercomputers thousands of years.¹⁰ This milestone not only highlights the speed advantages of quantum computing but also its potential to solve problems that are currently intractable for classical computers.

Entanglement, another fundamental principle of quantum mechanics, allows qubits that are spatially separated to connect in ways that enhance processing power exponentially as more qubits are entangled^.11 This feature is crucial for scaling up quantum systems and is being actively developed by companies like IBM and Rigetti, which are integrating quantum processors with classical systems to harness these capabilities for practical applications.^12,13 However, operationalizing quantum computing technology also presents significant challenges, such as the need for ultralow temperatures and sophisticated error correction mechanisms to maintain qubit stability and coherence over longer durations.^14,15 These technological hurdles underscore the ongoing innovations required to make quantum computing widely usable and reliable.

Encryption and Cryptography: The Quantum Threat

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to classical encryption methods, particularly due to its ability to efficiently exploit quantum algorithms like Shor’s, which can factorize large integers, a critical component underpinning public-key cryptographic systems such as RSA. Current encryption strategies based on the computational difficulty of factorizing large prime numbers may become obsolete as quantum ­computers reach the capability to break these codes swiftly.^16,17 The implications of data security are profound, as financial institutions, governments, and other entities heavily rely on public-key cryptography to secure everything from financial transactions to confidential communications. The advent of quantum computing could expose these systems to unprecedented vulnerabilities, prompting an urgent reevaluation of how ­sensitive information is protected.^18,19

In response, the focus has shifted to postquantum cryptography (PQC), which involves developing cryptographic systems secure against both quantum and classical computers. Leading candidates in this new cryptographic paradigm include lattice-based cryptography, hash-based cryptography, and multivariate quadratic equations.^20,21 Transitioning to quantum-resistant algorithms ­poses complex challenges. It is crucial to develop new algorithms that are scalable and compatible with existing communication protocols. This transition must be preemptive; if quantum ­capabilities are realized before protective measures are implemented, then the resultant security risks could be catastrophic.^22,23 The race toward quantum-resistant cryptography (QRC) represents a necessary evolution in data security protocols to safeguard digital information in the forthcoming quantum era.²⁴

Quantum-Resistant Cryptography: Fortifying Against Quantum Threats

The evolution of quantum computing ushers in both opportunities and vulnerabilities, particularly for data security. QRC refers to cryptographic systems designed to be secure against both conventional and quantum computing threats.²⁵ As quantum computers threaten to break much of the current cryptographic infrastructure, notably RSA and ECC, the development of QRC has become critical. One of the most promising approaches in QRC is ­lattice-based cryptography, which relies on the hardness of lattice problems that remain difficult for quantum computers to solve. Lattice-based schemes like the Learning with Errors (LWE) and NTRU are gaining traction due to their potential to withstand quantum attacks.^26,27 Unlike factoring-based systems, these rely on problems that no known quantum algorithm can efficiently break.

Hash-based cryptography is another area being developed for quantum resistance. These systems use cryptographic hash functions to secure data and are believed to be quantum-resistant due to the nature of their underlying algorithms. The security of hash-based signatures lies in the one-way function of hashing, which even quantum computers struggle to reverse.²⁸ Multivariate cryptography is also considered a robust alternative, relying on the complexity of solving systems of multivariate polynomial equations—a problem that is generally difficult for both classical and quantum computers. This method has been proposed for digital signatures and encryption, adding a valuable tool to the quantum-resistant toolkit.²⁹

In addition to these, code-based cryptography continues to hold promise. This method, derived from error-correcting codes, has been under consideration for its resilience against quantum attacks, focusing primarily on its application in secure communication protocols.³⁰ The transition to quantum-resistant algorithms will involve not only technological adaptation but also broad policy changes and updates to global cryptographic standards. Organizations such as the ­National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are actively involved in standardizing quantum-­resistant cryptographic protocols to guide this transition globally.³¹ As these quantum-resistant technologies develop, it is crucial for governments and private sectors to prioritize their integration to safeguard sensitive data against the impending quantum future. The shift to QRC isn’t merely a preventive measure but a necessary evolution to maintain confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data in the postquantum era.³²

Privacy Concerns

Surveillance and Privacy: Quantum Advances and Ethical Dilemmas

The advent of quantum computing presents profound implications for surveillance capabilities, significantly amplifying both the scale and the precision of data monitoring systems. The quantum technology could feasibly decrypt encrypted communications that were previously considered secure, potentially enabling unprecedented access to private data. The ethical considerations of such enhanced surveillance are profound and multifaceted, raising critical questions about privacy rights in a postquantum world.³³ Recent advancements in quantum computing have led researchers to explore its potential applications in enhancing surveillance technologies. For instance, quantum-enhanced algorithms could process complex datasets more efficiently, facilitating more comprehensive monitoring of digital communications.³⁴ Moreover, the inherent capability of quantum systems to perform complex pattern recognition could be employed to monitor and predict human behaviors at scale, a capability that could be both beneficial for security and invasive in terms of privacy.³⁵

The dual-use nature of these technologies—capable of both safeguarding and undermining privacy—necessitates a balanced approach to policy and regulation. Governments and regulatory bodies face the challenge of fostering innovation in quantum technologies while also implementing robust safeguards to protect individual privacy.³⁶ This includes the development of quantum-resistant encryption methods that can secure data against the potential decryption capabilities of quantum computers.³⁷ Ethical frameworks are urgently required to guide the deployment of these technologies, ensuring that they are used in a manner that respects privacy rights and promotes trust in digital systems. Such frameworks should encourage transparency and accountability, ensuring that surveillance practices facilitated by quantum computing adhere to ethical standards that protect individual rights.³⁸ As quantum computing continues to evolve, the ­dialogue between technologists, policymakers, ­ethicists, and the public will be crucial in navigating the complex interplay between advanced surveillance capabilities and the fundamental right to privacy.³⁹

Individual Privacy and Quantum Computing

Data Breaches and Enhanced Data Mining: Quantum computing introduces unprecedented computational power, which, while beneficial for complex problem-solving, poses significant risks to personal privacy.⁴⁰ The ability of quantum computers to process vast amounts of data at unparalleled speeds can make traditional data protection mechanisms obsolete, rendering personal information more vulnerable to breaches.^41,42

Deepening Data Mining: Enhanced computational capabilities enable deeper data mining and analytics, allowing for more detailed profiles of individuals ­without their consent or knowledge.⁴³ The risk of unauthorized surveillance and profiling increases as the quantum technology progresses, raising ethical concerns about the balance between technological advancement and privacy rights.⁴⁴

Implications for Current Privacy Measures: Existing privacy protections, such as encryption and anonymization, are designed for a prequantum era and are likely inadequate against quantum decryption methods.^45,46 The development of quantum-resistant cryptographic measures is critical, but their implementation poses logistical and financial challenges, particularly for smaller organizations.^47,48

Long-term Implications for Society: As the quantum technology becomes more mainstream, its impact on individual privacy will likely become more pronounced. This progression calls for proactive measures from policymakers, technologists, and civil society to safeguard personal privacy against potential quantum-era invasions.⁴⁹

Economic Impact

Industry Disruption: Quantum Computing’s Transformative Impact

Quantum computing, heralded as the next frontier in technological innovation, poses a seismic shift across various industries, with its potential to solve complex problems exponentially faster than classical computers.⁵⁰ This computational power is poised to revolutionize sectors that rely heavily on data analysis and complex simulations such as pharmaceuticals, automotive, and finance.^51,52

Pharmaceuticals: In the pharmaceutical industry, quantum computing could drastically reduce the time and cost associated with drug discovery. By accurately simulating molecular interactions at an unprecedented scale, quantum computers are expected to expedite the identification of new drugs and predict their interactions without needing extensive physical trials.⁵³ This capability could lead to a significant reduction in the development cycle of new medications, potentially transforming patient outcomes worldwide.⁵⁴

Automotive: The automotive sector, particularly in the development of autonomous vehicles, stands to gain immensely from quantum computing. The optimization of traffic systems and real-time data processing capabilities of quantum computers could enhance the efficiency and safety of autonomous driving systems.⁵⁵ Additionally, material science applications, crucial for developing lighter and more efficient vehicles, are likely to see breakthroughs with the ability to simulate properties of materials and their interactions at the quantum level.⁵⁶

Finance: Financial institutions are preparing for the quantum revolution by investing in quantum computing to manage risk, optimize portfolios, and detect fraud more effectively.⁵⁷ Quantum algorithms offer the promise of significantly speeding up these tasks by handling vast datasets more efficiently than traditional computers, potentially reshaping financial strategies and operations.⁵⁸ Furthermore, the anticipated disruption is not ­without challenges; the widespread implementation of quantum computing could also lead to job displacement in sectors that become automated by these ­advanced computational technologies.⁵⁹ As industries adapt to these changes, the demand for new skill sets will surge, necessitating a shift in workforce development and education strategies to prepare for a quantum-influenced market landscape.⁶⁰

Job Market Shifts: The emergence of quantum computing promises to revolutionize various sectors, necessitating a profound shift in the job market to accommodate new technological demands. Quantum computing, by its very nature, requires specialized knowledge in quantum mechanics, computer science, and material science, which could lead to a surge in demand for professionals with this expertise.⁶¹ As industries such as cybersecurity, pharmaceuticals, and finance increasingly rely on quantum technologies, the demand for quantum programmers, engineers, and researchers is expected to rise significantly.⁶² However, this shift also poses challenges, particularly in job displacement. Traditional roles that involve data processing and analysis may undergo automation or require substantial upskilling to meet the new demands imposed by quantum computing technologies.⁶³ This shift could widen the skills gap, ­particularly affecting those in lower-tech roles who may find their skills outdated.⁶⁴

Training and education programs will be crucial in preparing the workforce for this transition. There is an increasing need for educational institutions to incorporate quantum computing into their curricula to arm future professionals with the necessary skills to thrive in a quantum-enhanced job market.⁶⁵ Furthermore, continuous professional development and retraining programs will play a critical role in helping current employees adapt to the changing landscape, ensuring that they are not left behind as the technology advances.⁶⁶ This evolution of the job market underscores the necessity for a strategic approach to workforce development, where both educational policy and corporate training programs are aligned with the advancing quantum technologies. The potential for significant economic benefits from quantum computing could be realized only if the workforce is adequately prepared to meet the new challenges and opportunities that come with it.⁶⁷

Ethical and Social Considerations

Ethical Dilemmas in Quantum Computing

The rapid advancement of quantum computing not only promises significant breakthroughs in computational capabilities but also introduces complex ethical dilemmas that challenge current governance ­frameworks.⁶⁸ The immense power of quantum computers to process information at unprecedented speeds presents potential risks, including the misuse of technology for intrusive surveillance or cyberattacks.^69,70 These concerns are amplified by the potential for quantum computing to crack encryption standards that protect vital data across global networks.⁷¹ Moreover, the disparity between nations in developing or accessing quantum computing technology could exacerbate the digital divide, leading to inequalities in technological empowerment and access to information.^72,73 This digital divide could hinder efforts to achieve global information equity, as developing countries may struggle to keep pace with the advancements made by wealthier nations.⁷⁴ Given these considerations, there is an urgent need for ethical frameworks that address both the potential benefits and risks associated with quantum computing. These frameworks must ensure that quantum advancements do not compromise individual privacy or global security but instead contribute positively to societal development.^75,76 Such ethical oversight will require international cooperation to develop standards and regulations that foster responsible innovation while mitigating the risks of misuse and unequal access.⁷⁷

Global Implications: Anticipating the Impact of Quantum Computing

Quantum computing promises to revolutionize a wide array of fields, from cryptography to drug discovery, by leveraging capabilities that surpass traditional computing powers. As nations across the globe grapple with the implications of this emerging technology, disparities in technological readiness and access could deepen existing global inequalities. Advanced nations with robust technological ­infrastructures are already positioning themselves as leaders in quantum research and development. For instance, the United States and the European Union have launched significant initiatives aimed at advancing the quantum technology, reflecting in government-funded research and public–private partnerships.⁷⁸ Conversely, many developing countries, which are still struggling to bridge the basic digital divide, risk falling further behind in the quantum race. This divide could lead to a scenario where quantum technologies are predominantly controlled by a few nations, potentially leading to global imbalances in economic power and security capabilities.^79,80

Furthermore, the disparity in access to quantum technologies could exacerbate economic divides. Nations with the capacity to harness quantum computing may experience significant advancements in industries such as finance, where quantum algorithms offer the potential to optimize trading strategies and ­manage risk more efficiently than ever before.⁸¹ Such capabilities could alter global financial landscapes, concentrating power in the hands of nations and corporations that can afford to integrate these technologies.⁸²

Ethically, the deployment of quantum computing also raises significant concerns about surveillance and privacy, as enhanced computing power could theoretically break many of the cryptographic systems currently safeguarding global digital communications.⁸³ The international community faces a critical need to develop new standards and agreements to manage these risks, advocating for equitable access to quantum advancements and ensuring that these technologies do not become tools for oppression or unchecked surveillance.⁸⁴ This technological disparity calls for a concerted effort from the global community to ensure that quantum computing does not become another facet of geopolitical competition but a field of cooperative innovation. International regulatory frameworks and agreements, spearheaded by organizations such as the United Nations or the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), could play crucial roles in managing the development and deployment of quantum technologies, ensuring a balanced and equitable technological progression that benefits all of humanity.⁸⁵

Responsibility and Governance

As quantum computing evolves, it mandates a robust framework for international cooperation and governance to navigate its broad-reaching implications efficiently. The development of quantum technologies isn’t confined by national boundaries, necessitating a global perspective on regulatory approaches.⁸⁶ Key issues such as intellectual property rights, cybersecurity threats, and equitable access to technology must be addressed within these frameworks to prevent a stratification in capabilities that could exacerbate global inequalities.⁸⁷ The ITU has initiated discussions on setting global standards that ensure the safe and equitable use of the quantum computing technology. These include guidelines for quantum encryption and the global management of quantum communication networks.⁸⁸ Similarly, the United Nations has emphasized the importance of incorporating a wide range of stakeholders in the dialogue to create inclusive policies that account for the diverse impact of quantum technologies across different regions and sectors.⁸⁹

In terms of governance, there is a pressing need for agencies to understand quantum computing’s potential impacts fully. This understanding will aid in crafting policies that encourage innovation while protecting against the technology’s misuse. For instance, the European Union has proposed a Quantum Technologies Flagship, aimed at fostering research while simultaneously developing regulations that safeguard privacy and data security in the quantum age.⁹⁰ Moreover, collaborative initiatives like the Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C) in the United States are pivotal. They bring together industry, government, and academia to advance the development of quantum technologies while addressing the regulatory and ethical challenges posed by this new frontier.⁹¹ These efforts underline the crucial role of ­cooperative strategies that extend beyond national policies to foster a safe, secure, and beneficial quantum future.⁹² Such proactive governance will be essential in mitigating risks and leveraging opportunities presented by quantum computing. As the technology advances, the need for an adaptive and forward-thinking regulatory environment becomes ever more critical, underscoring the necessity for international dialogue and collaboration in shaping the quantum landscape.⁹³

Conclusion

The advent of quantum computing stands poised to revolutionize our societal frameworks, touching everything from data security to economic structures. This review has illuminated the significant impacts and potential of quantum computing in redefining the landscape of cybersecurity by demonstrating both the vulnerabilities of current encryption methodologies and the progressive steps toward QRC. It has also highlighted the dual-edged nature of quantum advancements, offering unparalleled computational power that could enhance privacy and data security, while simultaneously posing risks through potential increases in surveillance capabilities. As we stand on this technological brink, it is imperative that stakeholders from various sectors—­policy, ­education, and industry—engage proactively to ­harness the benefits of quantum computing while mitigating its risks. Regulatory frameworks must evolve alongside these technological advances to address ethical dilemmas and manage the equitable distribution of quantum technologies globally. Looking ahead, the trajectory of quantum computing promises to reshape our digital and physical worlds fundamentally. It necessitates a balanced ­approach that fosters innovation and addresses the digital ­divide, ensuring that these powerful technologies do not exacerbate existing inequalities but rather contribute to a more interconnected and equitable global society. The journey ahead will require sustained collaboration, thoughtful governance, and an unwavering commitment to navigating the complex ethical landscapes posed by these emerging technologies.

References

1 Castelvecchi D. Quantum computers ready to leap out of the lab in 2017. Nat News. 2017;541(7635):9-10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/541009a
 
2 Gyongyosi L, Imre S. A survey on quantum computing technology. Comput Sci Rev. 2019;31:51-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002
 
3 Mosca M. Quantum algorithms and the future of post-classical computing. IEEE Comput. 2018;51(10):38-46.
 
4 Allan D, Damian E. Economic implications of quantum computing. Int J Quantum Inf. 2020;18(2):1940023.
 
5 Nielsen MA, Chuang IL. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. 2010.
 
6 Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, Horodecki K. Quantum entanglement. Rev Mod Phys. 2009;81(2):865.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
 
7 Ekert A, Jozsa R. Quantum computation and Shor’s factoring algorithm. Rev Mod Phys. 1996;68(3):733.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.733
 
8 Ladd TD, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien JL. Quantum computers. Nature. 2010;464(7285):45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08812
 
9 Gyongyosi L, Imre S. A Survey on quantum computing technology. Comput Sci Rev. 2019;31:51-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.11.002
 
10 Arute F, et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature. 2019;574(7779):505-10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
 
11 Horodecki R, et al. Quantum entanglement. Rev Mod Phys. 2009;81(2):865.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
 
12 IBM Quantum. Progress in Quantum Computing. IBM. 2021.
 
13 Rigetti Computing. Quantum Computing in the Cloud. Rigetti. 2021.
 
14 Devoret MH, Schoelkopf RJ. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An Outlook. Science. 2013;339(6124):1169-74.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231930
 
15 Preskill J. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum. 2018;2:79.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
 
16 Bernstein DJ, Buchmann J, Dahmen E. Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer. 2009.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7
 
17 Chen L, et al. Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2016.
 
18 Gidney C, Ekerå M. How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits. Quantum. 2021.
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433
 
19 Mosca M. Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: will we be ready? IEEE Secur Priv. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.3761723
 
20 Peikert C. A Decade of Lattice Cryptography. Now Foundations and Trends. 2016.
https://doi.org/10.1561/9781680831139
 
21 Bernstein DJ, Lange T. Post-quantum cryptography. Nature. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59879-6_18
 
22 NIST. Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization. 2020.
 
23 NIST. Considerations for Managing Internet of Things (IoT) Cybersecurity and Privacy Risks. NISTIR 8228. 2020.
 
24 NIST. Status Report on the Second Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process. NISTIR 8309; 2020.
 
25 Bernstein DJ, et al. Post-quantum cryptography for long-term security. In: PQCrypto 2017: Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer: Cham. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59879-6_18
 
26 Alagic G, et al. Status report on the first round of the NIST post-quantum cryptography standardization process. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2019.
 
27 Laarhoven T. Sieving for shortest vectors in lattices using angular locality-sensitive hashing. In: Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2015. Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg. 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47989-6_1
 
28 Hülsing A, et al. XMSS: Extended Merkle Signature Scheme; RFC (Ed.). RFC 8391. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC8391
 
29 Ding J, et al. Post-quantum cryptography: State of the art. J Comput Secur. 2017;25(4):427-69.
 
30 Misoczki R, et al. MDPC-McEliece: New McEliece variants from moderate density parity-check codes. In: 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory. IEEE. 2013.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2013.6620590
 
31 Chen L, et al. Report on Post-Quantum Cryptography. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2016.
 
32 Bos JW, et al. CRYSTALS – Kyber: A CCA-secure module-lattice-based KEM. In: 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). IEEE. 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00032
 
33 Mattern T. Quantum surveillance: The end of encryption? J Cyber Polic. 2021.
 
34 Jain A, et al. Quantum algorithms for complex pattern recognition: Applications in surveillance technology. In: Quantum Information Processing, 2022.
 
35 Petrov J. The quantum leap: Implications for mass surveillance and privacy. Eur J Law Techn. 2021.
 
36 Hardy Q, Newman L. Navigating the quantum future: Innovations and implications. In: Technology and Governance, 2022.
 
37 Liu C, et al. Developing quantum-resistant encryption: A near-future necessity. J Cryptol. 2023.
 
38 Kapoor A. Ethical considerations in quantum computing: A framework for action. Philos Technol. 2022.
 
39 Benson K, et al. Public policy in the quantum age: Balancing innovation and privacy. Public Aff Q. 2023.
 
40 National Research Council. Potential Impacts of Quantum Computing on Data Privacy. National Academies Press. 2021.
 
41 Zhao Y, Zhang L. Quantum computing: A privacy risk assessment. J Comput Secur. 2022;30(4):495-517.
 
42 Carter A, Gupta N. Exploring the risks of quantum computing to personal privacy. Technol Priv J. 2023;15(2):134-55.
 
43 Thompson, S. The double-edged sword of quantum computing in data mining. Int J Quantum Inf. 2021;19(5):2050035.
 
44 Liu X, Ren Y. Ethical considerations of quantum computing technology. J. Inf. Ethics. 2022;31(1):88-102.
 
45 Hardy Q. Addressing the Quantum Threat to Privacy. Privacy Today. 2023.
 
46 Beale J, Firth L. Quantum computing and data protection: Challenges ahead. J Cyber Secur. 2023;29(1):12-29.
 
47 Kumar V, Singh P. Implementing quantum-resistant cryptography in business. Busin IT J. 2022.
 
48 Moreno C. Quantum computing and its impact on small enterprises’ privacy measures. Small Busin J. 2023;37(4):401-25.
 
49 Patel, D. Societal implications of quantum advances. J Soc Inform. 2023;24(2):112-38.
 
50 Castelvecchi D. Quantum computers ready to leap out of the lab in 2017. Nat News. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1038/541009a
 
51 Sasaki M, Carlini P. Quantum computing and the pharmaceutical industry. Pharmaceutical Research. 2021.
 
52 Martinez V, O’Brien JL. Quantum computing: potential impacts on the automotive industry. IEEE Trans Quant Eng. 2020.
 
53 Le TT, Ho TB. Accelerating drug discovery using quantum computing. J Chem Inform Model. 2019.
 
54 Mazzola G, Piattini M. Quantum simulation of molecular dynamics: from quantum chemistry to drug discovery. Quant Informa Process. 2020.
 
55 Harrow AW, Montanaro A. Quantum computational supremacy and its applications. Nature. 2021.
 
56 Baker MJ, Wessels BW. Materials simulation using quantum computing. Ann Rev Mater Res. 2018.
 
57 Orus R, Mugel S, Lizaso E. Quantum computing for finance: Overview and prospects. Rev Phys. 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revip.2019.100028
 
58 Egger DJ, Gambella C, Marecek J, McFaddin H, Mevissen M, Ray S, et al. Quantum computing for Finance: state of the art and future prospects. IEEE Trans Quant Eng. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TQE.2020.3030314
 
59 Biamonte J, Wittek P, Pancotti N, Rebentrost P, Wiebe N, Lloyd S. Quantum machine learning. Nature. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474
 
60 Aaronson S. Quantum computing and the limits of the efficiently computable. Proc. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015.
 
61 Ball P. The dawn of the quantum workforce. Nature. 2022;591(7851):535-37.
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00511-3
 
62 Castelvecchi D. Quantum computers are poised to reshape industries. Nat News. 2021.
 
63 Gershgorn D. The job market for quantum computing is heating up. Quartz. 2021.
 
64 Brown B, LaFond G. Preparing for a quantum future: How quantum technologies are changing business. Deloitte Insights. 2022.
 
65 Sutor RS. Building a Quantum Workforce. Quantum Industry Report. 2022.
 
66 Lee K, Kim D. Quantum education and the future of work. TechCrunch. 2021.
 
67 Morris S. The economic impact of quantum computing. Financial Times. 2023.
 
68 Gershgorn D. The ethics of quantum computing. IEEE Spectr. 2021;58(1):24-9.
 
69 Klinger J, Foster B. Quantum surveillance and privacy in the era of quantum computing. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2022;41:105431.
 
70 Vella M. Ethical implications of quantum computing: Surveillance and privacy considerations. Ethics Inform Technol. 2022;24(2):153-65.
 
71 Markoff J. Quantum computing and the future of encryption. J Cyber Polic. 2021;6(2):234-45.
 
72 Schmidt E, Cohen J. The digital divide and global implications of quantum advancements. Foreign Affa. 2021;100(2):98-110.
 
73 Harper R, Slaughter S. Balancing the scales: Quantum computing and global inequalities. Sci Technol Human Valu. 2022;47(4):621-45.
 
74 Cohen G, Patel M. Quantum leap: Addressing the global digital divide. Technol Soc. 2021;64:101512.
 
75 Nakashima E. Ethical frameworks for quantum computing: Considering societal impacts. Philo Technol. 2021;34(3):567-82.
 
76 Carter L, Weckert J. International governance of quantum technology: Ethical considerations. J Respons Innovat. 2021;8(2):227-44.
 
77 Otto P. Developing international standards for quantum computing. Stand Genom Sci. 2020;15(1):35-48.
 
78 Patel A, Wang S. Quantum initiatives: A global view. Quant Sci. Technol. 2021;6(2):024002.
 
79 Kapoor A, Sharma P. Bridging the digital divide in the quantum age. Intl J Quant Inform. 2022;20(4):1750034.
 
80 Li J, Zhang H. The quantum gap: Technological disparities and impacts on global economics. J. Glob Tech. Adv. 2023;11(1):15-29.
 
81 Brooks R. Quantum computing and financial markets: The next revolution. J Financ Econom. 2022;141(1):5-24.
 
82 Thompson H, Lee D. Economic implications of quantum computing: A global perspective. Econ J Quant Econ. 2021;3(3):210-28.
 
83 Singh M, Gupta V. Quantum cryptography and the future of cyber security. J Cybersecur Priv. 2022;2(2):134-45.
 
84 Moreno C. International security and quantum computing: Emerging risks and strategies. Strateg Stud Q. 2023;17(1):42-65.
 
85 Fuentes I, Harrow A. Cooperative frameworks for global quantum advancements. Quant Rep. 2021;3(4):460-78.
 
86 International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Quantum Information Technology Framework. ITU. 2022.
 
87 United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). Securing Our Common Future: An Agenda for Disarmament. UNODA. 2022.
 
88 International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Global Standards for Quantum Networks. ITU. 2022.
 
89 United Nations. Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Ensuring Inclusive Development. United Nations. 2023.
 
90 European Commission. Europe’s Digital Future: The Quantum Technologies Flagship. European Commission. 2022.
 
91 Quantum Economic Development Consortium (QED-C). Strategic Vision for Quantum Economic Development. QED-C. 2023.
 
92 World Economic Forum. Quantum Governance Principles in the Global Context. WEF. 2023.
 
93 Future of Life Institute. Towards Responsible Quantum Computing. Future of Life Institute. 2023.

Cite this article as:
Wheatley MC. Quantum Shifts: The Societal Implications of Quantum Computing on Security, Privacy, and the Economy. Premier Journal of Computer Science 2024;1:100002

Export to EndNote Export to Mendeley