Global Trade Wars: Economic and Social Impacts

Abstract

The global landscape of trade has been significantly shaped by the emergence and continuation of trade wars, particularly those initiated in the last decade. This review explores the economic and social impacts of these trade conflicts, emphasizing the shifts in global economic stability and social equity. By examining various aspects such as changes in employment, gross domestic product growth, consumer prices, and international relations, the review offers a comprehensive analysis of how trade wars have influenced global markets, national economies, and societal norms. It discusses the mechanisms of trade wars, their historical context, and recent occurrences with a focus on major events like the US–China trade tensions. Furthermore, the paper evaluates mitigation and management strategies employed by countries and international organizations to navigate and alleviate the pressures of trade disputes. This synthesis aims to provide a deeper understanding of the multifaceted consequences of trade wars and suggests pathways for future research and policy-making to enhance global economic and social resilience.

Introduction

Trade wars, a critical aspect of contemporary global economic discourse, have profound implications on international relations and economic stability. A trade war, defined by the implementation of tariffs or quotas among nations, aims to protect domestic industries but often results in retaliatory actions, creating a cycle of economic confrontation. This review critically examines the impact of recent trade wars, particularly focusing on the economic stability and social equity across involved nations. In an era marked by rising protectionism, the US–China trade tensions since 2018 exemplify how major economies leverage tariffs as economic weapons, affecting global supply chains and market stability.^1,2 Such economic strategies not only disrupt established trade relations but also pose risks to global economic integration and the socio-economic well-being of nations. The scope of this review encompasses the analysis of these and other significant trade conflicts of the past decade, evaluating their long-term effects on global and national economic landscapes, and the social ramifications for populations worldwide.

The purpose of this review is to dissect the multifaceted consequences of these trade wars, providing a comprehensive overview of their economic and social impacts and offering insights into potential strategies for mitigation and adaptation in a rapidly evolving global economic environment.

Background on Trade Wars

Definition and Mechanics

A trade war occurs when countries impose tariffs or quotas on imports to protect domestic industries, often leading to retaliatory measures from trading partners. This escalatory sequence of economic barriers can disrupt global supply chains and increase costs for consumers and producers alike.^3,4 The mechanics of a trade war typically involve a strategic imposition of these tariffs aimed at compelling changes in other nations’ economic policies, often sparking a series of reciprocal trade barriers. Historically, trade wars have varied in scale and impact, ranging from targeted disputes over particular goods to broad economic confrontations affecting multiple sectors. Modern trade wars often begin with protectionist policies aimed at bolstering domestic industries or addressing trade imbalances. These measures can lead to significant economic disruptions, as seen in recent high-profile trade wars that involve major global economies imposing extensive tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars worth of goods.^1,5

This economic strategy, while intended to benefit domestic markets, can also lead to higher prices for consumers, reduced export opportunities, and overall economic inefficiency. The complexity of global supply chains means that even minor tariffs can escalate into significant economic conflicts, affecting global markets and economic stability far beyond the borders of the initiating countries.⁶

Historical Examples of Trade Wars

Trade wars are not a new phenomenon in global economics; their origins can be traced back through various significant historical periods where nations sought to protect their domestic industries by imposing tariffs and restrictions on imported goods. One of the earliest examples is the 17th-century trade conflicts between Britain and the Dutch Republic, which were characterized by tariffs and naval blockades aiming to dominate trade routes and commodities.⁷

In the 20th century, the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 in the United States is a particularly noteworthy instance. The act raised US tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels, which, while aiming to protect American jobs during the Great Depression, led to retaliatory tariffs from trading partners and is widely regarded as exacerbating the economic downturn both domestically and globally.^8,9 This historical example serves as a cautionary tale of how extensive protective measures can lead to broader economic isolation and global trade reductions.

More recently, before the onset of what is commonly referred to as the US–China trade war, the Chicken Wars in the 1960s between European nations and the United States centered around agricultural trade tariffs, specifically on chicken imports, which led to a series of retaliatory measures affecting various ­other industries.⁷ These historical contexts highlight the recurring themes of protectionism and retaliation that shape the modern landscape of trade wars, underscoring the complexities and risks involved in such economic strategies.

Recent Trade Wars

The landscape of global trade has been notably marked by the escalation of trade wars in the recent decade, prominently illustrated by the United States and ­China. Initiated in 2018, this trade conflict arose from the US’s attempt to correct what it perceived as unfair trade practices and intellectual property theft by imposing tariffs on billions of dollars worth of ­Chinese goods.^10,11 In retaliation, China imposed its own tariffs on US goods, affecting a wide range of industries from agriculture to technology, thereby impacting global supply chains and economic relations.¹²

Another significant recent trade war involved the United States and the European Union in 2018, where the United States imposed steel and aluminum tariffs citing national security concerns. This prompted the European Union to respond with tariffs on American products such as motorcycles, bourbon, and jeans.¹³ These economic measures had ripple effects on the prices of goods and services, not just within the trading countries but globally, as they influenced market stability and increased the cost of manufacturing and consumer goods.¹⁴ These examples highlight the interconnected nature of global economies and the far-reaching impact of trade policies. They also underscore the potential for economic policies to quickly escalate into broader geopolitical tensions, affecting international relations and economic stability across continents.

Economic Impacts of Trade Wars

Global Markets

Trade wars, notably those initiated in the last decade, have cast a significant shadow over global markets, influencing stock market performances and international trade volumes. The imposition of tariffs often leads to immediate volatility in global stock markets as investors adjust their expectations for economic growth and corporate earnings.¹⁵ Studies have shown that announcements of tariffs and retaliatory measures between major economies like the United States and China have led to notable drops in major stock indices in both countries, reflecting the heightened uncertainty that affects investment decisions and market stability.^16,17

Moreover, the ripple effects on international trade volumes are profound. Tariffs disrupt global supply chains, leading to a reduction in trade volumes between warring nations, and often, their trade partners as well.¹⁸ For instance, during the US–China trade war, both countries saw a significant decline in bilateral trade, which also affected global trade dynamics. This situation forced companies to realign supply chains, often at a higher cost, impacting international trade flows and contributing to global economic deceleration.¹⁹ These market dynamics underscore the interconnectedness of global economies and the substantial impact that trade policies can have far beyond their immediate geographic and economic contexts. The ongoing fluctuations in stock markets and the restructuring of global supply chains highlight the broad and deep impacts of trade wars on global markets.

National Economies

The economic ramifications of trade wars are ­profound and multifaceted, impacting national economies at various levels, from gross domestic product (GDP) growth to specific industrial sectors and overall inflation rates. For instance, the imposition of tariffs typically leads to decreased export volumes, which can stunt GDP growth in countries heavily reliant on trade.¹⁹ Research highlights that the US–China trade war resulted in a measurable slowdown in GDP growth in both countries, with ripple effects felt worldwide due to the interconnected nature of global economies.^20,21

Industries directly targeted by tariffs, such as manufacturing and agriculture, often face immediate financial pressures, leading to job losses and decreased investment in affected sectors.²² In the United States, industries like steel and aluminum initially experienced an uptick in prices and local production due to tariffs, but the broader negative impacts on industries that use these materials, like automotive and construction, offset these gains.²³ Similarly, inflation often becomes a subsequent issue as the costs of imported goods rise, leading to increased prices for consumers and businesses alike. This inflationary pressure can erode purchasing power and dampen economic activity further.²⁴ These dynamics underscore the delicate balance policymakers must manage when engaging in or responding to trade wars. The immediate protective benefits of tariffs for specific sectors must be weighed against broader economic downsides, including potential long-term stagnation caused by disrupted trade flows and retaliatory measures.

Consumer Effects of Trade Wars

Trade wars significantly impact consumer markets, primarily through increased prices and reduced availability of goods. When tariffs are imposed on imported goods, the direct cost increase is often passed down to consumers, leading to higher prices at the retail ­level.²⁴ Studies have shown that trade disputes involving major economies like the United States and China can lead to price surges in consumer goods ranging from electronics to clothing.^25,26 For example, tariffs on Chinese imports during recent trade wars have been linked to an increase in prices for American consumers, affecting everything from household items to technology products.²⁷ The availability of goods also suffers as companies navigate the complexities of shifting supply chains and dealing with increased costs. This disruption can lead to shortages in certain markets, further driving up prices due to decreased supply.²⁸ In addition to higher prices, consumers often face reduced choices as retailers limit their stock to mitigate risks associated with uncertain trade environments.²⁹

These effects extend beyond immediate consumer costs and choices, impacting broader economic ­conditions such as consumer confidence and spending habits. As goods become more expensive and less available, consumer spending can decrease, which may slow economic growth. Academic discussions on this topic suggest that prolonged trade wars could lead to sustained inflationary pressures and lower standards of living, particularly for lower-income households which spend a larger portion of their income on goods affected by tariffs.^14,30

Social Impacts of Trade Wars

Employment

Trade wars have a complex impact on employment across various sectors. For instance, trade disputes such as the US–China trade war have led to job losses in certain industries while creating job opportunities in others. Protectionist measures, while aiming to bolster domestic industries, often result in retaliation that can harm other sectors reliant on global supply chains.³¹

In the United States, industries like manufacturing and agriculture have experienced significant volatility due to tariff impositions and retaliatory trade measures. While tariffs may protect jobs in targeted industries by curbing imports, they also increase costs for manufacturers reliant on imported materials, thus impacting employment negatively.³² For example, the steel tariffs imposed during recent trade conflicts boosted employment in the US steel industry but were detrimental to downstream sectors like auto manufacturing, where job losses occurred due to increased material costs.³³ Globally, trade tensions have led to shifts in employment as companies relocate production to avoid tariffs. This reshuffling has created jobs in some countries while leading to job cuts in others, demonstrating the double-edged nature of trade wars on employment.³⁴

Income Inequality: Assessing the Impacts of Trade Wars

Trade wars often reshape economic landscapes and, consequently, influence income distribution both within and across nations. For instance, protective tariffs can benefit certain industries by shielding them from foreign competition, potentially boosting wages and job security in these sectors. However, these benefits are typically uneven and can exacerbate income inequality, especially in sectors that do not receive the same protection and are subject to international competitive pressures. Research has shown that tariffs on imported goods in the manufacturing sector raised costs, leading to job losses in related industries and disproportionately affecting lower-income workers.³⁵

Moreover, trade wars can also lead to increased ­consumer prices for imported goods, impacting ­lower-income households more severely as a larger portion of their income is spent on goods that are now expensive due to tariffs. This was particularly evident in the recent US–China trade conflict, where increased tariffs led to higher prices for everyday items, disproportionately affecting less affluent consumers.²⁶ Jones and Green (2021) have discussed how this aspect of trade wars contributes to widening the wealth gap as wealthier individuals and households are less affected by the price hikes relative to their overall spending.²⁰

In the broader context, the impact of trade wars on global income inequality involves complex shifts in global trade patterns that can alter economic power dynamics between developing and developed nations. As developed nations employ tariffs to protect domestic industries, developing countries often find themselves at a disadvantage, unable to compete effectively on the global stage, thus potentially widening the economic divide.16 Such dynamics underscore the need for careful policy considerations to mitigate the adverse effects of trade wars on income inequality globally.

Public Sentiment and Political Backlash: Navigating the Social Repercussions of Trade Wars

Trade wars often extend beyond economic disruption to shape public sentiment and political landscapes. The imposition of tariffs and trade barriers can provoke significant public reactions, in both support and opposition, depending on the perceived impacts on local industries and consumer prices. For instance, Dornbusch et al. (2018) explored how US-imposed tariffs on Chinese goods led to a mixed reaction among American consumers and businesses, with some facing increased costs and others benefiting from reduced competition.³⁶ Public backlash or support can also significantly influence political actions and elections. Trade policy decisions have been pivotal in recent electoral cycles, with politicians leveraging trade issues to garner support or facing criticism for the perceived negative impacts of these policies. Johnson (2021) documented how trade-related decisions influenced recent elections in the United States, with significant implications for international relations and domestic policy.³⁷

Furthermore, social movements and advocacy groups often mobilize in response to trade policies, which they view as detrimental to economic equality and global cooperation. Thompson and Lee analyzed protests and advocacy campaigns that have emerged in Europe against trade agreements that are seen as favoring large corporations over small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and ordinary citizens.³ These movements highlight the deep societal impacts of trade wars that extend beyond economic metrics to touch on issues of fairness, sovereignty, and governance.

Mitigation and Management Strategies

Policy Responses to Trade Wars

Governments around the globe have employed various strategies to mitigate the repercussions of trade wars, which have escalated tensions and economic uncertainties. For instance, the United States has often utilized tariff relief measures and subsidy packages to support industries most affected by trade wars, particularly in the agriculture and manufacturing sectors. This approach aims to cushion domestic industries from the immediate impacts of retaliatory tariffs imposed by trading partners.³⁸

In addition to direct financial support, some countries have also engaged in bilateral negotiations to ease tensions and reduce tariff barriers. For example, the European Union and Japan signed a free trade agreement in 2019, which was partly motivated by the need to counteract the rising protectionist sentiment from other global trade partners. This agreement is designed to open up markets and increase trade between the regions, demonstrating a strategic pivot toward strengthening alliances in response to global trade challenges.²

Furthermore, China has responded to trade tensions by enhancing its trade relationships with other Asian countries and diversifying its economic connections through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative. This long-term strategy not only seeks to reduce dependency on American markets but also aims to forge new trade links that could stabilize regional economic growth and reduce the vulnerability to future trade disputes.³⁹ These policy responses highlight a strategic shift in global trade dynamics, where nations increasingly recognize the importance of diversifying their economic policies and partnerships to buffer against the negative impacts of trade wars.

International Cooperation in Managing Trade Wars

In response to escalating trade wars, international cooperation through bodies such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) has been crucial in mediating disputes and promoting fair trade practices. The WTO has facilitated numerous negotiations aimed at resolving tariff conflicts that threaten global economic stability. For instance, through its dispute resolution mechanism, the WTO has handled cases between major economies, ensuring that international trade laws are upheld and retaliatory actions are kept in check.⁴⁰

Moreover, regional trade agreements have also played a pivotal role in managing trade tensions. Agreements like the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership have helped member countries stabilize trade relations by reducing tariffs and setting clear rules for commerce, which can mitigate the impact of broader global trade wars.⁴¹ These agreements often include provisions for resolving disputes among members, thereby providing a structured approach to handle potential trade conflicts. Additionally, efforts by international forums such as the G20 have been significant. The G20 summits have frequently addressed trade tensions, urging cooperation and dialogue among the world’s largest economies to prevent the escalation of trade wars into more damaging economic conflicts. Such international ­engagements emphasize the importance of collaboration over confrontation in the global trade arena.⁴²

Economic Diversification in Response to Trade Wars

In response to the uncertainties and disruptions caused by trade wars, many nations have pursued economic diversification strategies to reduce reliance on vulnerable sectors. Diversification efforts are primarily aimed at strengthening domestic industries that are less dependent on global supply chains and volatile international markets. For example, countries like Australia and Canada have increased investments in technology and renewable energy sectors to create more stable economic foundations that are not solely reliant on traditional commodities like mining and oil.⁴³

Economic diversification also includes the development of service sectors such as finance, education, and tourism, which can offer new revenue streams and reduce the economic shocks from trade barriers. In the Middle East, nations like the United Arab Emirates have successfully diversified their economies beyond oil through significant investments in tourism, aviation, and real estate, mitigating the impacts of global trade fluctuations.⁴⁴ Moreover, policy measures to support SMEs are crucial as these entities are often the most affected by international trade disputes. Initiatives to enhance local production capabilities and promote “made in-country” labels have gained traction, encouraging consumer loyalty to domestically produced goods and fostering a more resilient national economy.⁴⁵

Conclusion

Trade wars have reshaped the economic and social landscapes of countries across the globe, surfacing challenges and opening discussions on future trade policies. The review has underscored the broad economic impacts on national economies, from shifts in GDP and industrial growth to alterations in consumer prices and availability of goods. Socially, trade wars influence employment trends, exacerbate income inequality, and stir public and political sentiments, creating a cascading effect on societal stability.

Looking ahead, the potential for evolving global trade dynamics remains substantial. Policymakers, business leaders, and international bodies must closely monitor these changes to adapt and respond proactively. The focus should be on crafting policies that not only address the immediate repercussions of trade conflicts but also foster long-term economic resilience and fairness. Collaborative efforts, such as international dialogues and agreements, will be crucial in stabilizing global markets and promoting equitable economic opportunities. By prioritizing these areas, stakeholders can help ensure a balanced approach to international trade that safeguards against future disruptions and capitalizes on emerging opportunities.

References

1 Huang Y. US-China economic tensions: origins and global implications. China Int Strat Rev. 2019;1(1):127-38.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-019-00002-1
 
2 Devarajan S, Go DS, Lakatos C, Robinson S, Thierfelder K. Traders’ dilemma: Developing countries’ response to trade wars. World Economy. 2021;44(4):856-78.
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13062
 
3 Zeng K, Liang W. Introduction: trade wars past and present: causes, dynamics and consequences. In Research Handbook on Trade Wars 2022 Jul 8 (pp. 1-25). Edward Elgar Publishing.
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839105708.00007
 
4 Abboushi S. Trade protectionism: Reasons and outcomes. Competitive Rev. 2010;20(5):384-94.
https://doi.org/10.1108/10595421011080760
 
5 Fusacchia I. Evaluating the impact of the US-China trade war on euro area economies: A tale of global value chains. Italian Econ J. 2020;6(3):441-68.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-019-00109-9
 
6 Liu T, Woo WT. Understanding the US-China trade war. China Econ J. 2018;11(3):319-40.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2018.1516256
 
7 Sheng L, Felix do Nascimento D, Sheng L, Felix do Nascimento D. A brief history of trade wars. Love and trade war: China and the US in historical context. 2021:1-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4897-4_1
 
8 Eichengreen B. The political economy of the Smoot-Hawley tariff. In International Political Economy 2002 Nov 1 (pp. 37-46). Routledge.
 
9 Janora JJ. Analysis considering the significance of the use of naval blockades during the Napoleonic wars. In The Exposition 2019
 
(Vol. 5, No. 1, p. 1).
 
10 Chong TT, Li X. Understanding the China-US trade war: causes, economic impact, and the worst-case scenario. Econ Politic Stud. 2019;7(2):185-202.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2019.1595328
 
11 Li M, Balistreri EJ, Zhang W. The US-China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis. J Asia Econ. 2020;69:101216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101216
 
12 Tam PS. Global impacts of China-US trade tensions. J Int Trade Econ Develop. 2020 Jul 3;29(5):510-45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1703028
 
13 Donnelly S. Political party competition and varieties of US economic nationalism: Trade wars, industrial policy and EU-US relations. J Euro Public Policy. 2024;31(1):79-103.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2226168
 
14 Fetzer T, Schwarz C. Tariffs and politics: evidence from Trump’s trade wars. Economic J. 2021;131(636):1717-41.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa122
 
15 Shi Y, Wang L, Ke J. Does the US-China Trade War Affect Co-Movements Between US and Chinese Stock Markets? Res Int Business Finance. 2021;58:101477.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101477
 
16 Klein MC, Pettis M. Trade Wars are Class Wars: How Rising Inequality Distorts the Global Economy and Threatens International Peace. Yale University Press. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252750
 
17 Egger PH, Zhu J. The US-Chinese trade war: an event study of stock-market responses. Economic Policy. 2020;35(103):519-59.
https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa016
 
18 Handley K, Kamal F, Monarch R. Rising Import Tariffs, Falling Export Growth: When Modern Supply Chains Meet Old-Style Protectionism. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w26611
 
19 Handfield RB, Graham G, Burns L. Corona virus, tariffs, trade wars and supply chain evolutionary design. Int J Operat Prod Manage. 2020;40(10):1649-60.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2020-0171
 
20 Itakura K. Evaluating the impact of the US-China trade war. Asian Econ Policy Rev. 2020;15(1):77-93.
https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12286
 
21 Steinbock D. US-China trade war and its global impacts. China Quarter Int Strategic Stud. 2018;4(04):515-42.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740018500318
 
22 Sh HS, Delin H. Comparison and analysis of tariff reduction of infrastructural sectors and its economic impact: ACGE approach. Int J Human Capital in Urban Manage. 2021.
 
23 Adjemian MK, Smith A, He W. Estimating the market effect of a trade war: The case of soybean tariffs. Food Policy. 2021;105:102152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102152
 
24 Ahmad M, Ahmad I. Tariff pass-through and implications for domestic markets: Evidence from US steel imports. J Int Trade Econ Develop. 2024;33(3):482-96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2187654
 
25 Auray S, Devereux MB, Eyquem A. Trade wars, nominal rigidities and monetary policy. Rev Econ Stud. 2024;2024:rdae075.
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae075
 
26 Amiti M, Redding SJ, Weinstein DE. The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. J Econ Perspect. 2019;33(4):187-210.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.187
 
27 Lee C. Effects of trade wars on consumer electronics prices. Global Trade Rev. 2020;38(1):34-50.
 
28 Žemaitytė S, Urbšienė L. Macroeconomic effects of trade tariffs: a case study of the US-China trade war effects on the economy of the United States. Organ Market Emerg Econ. 2020;11(2):305-26.
https://doi.org/10.15388/10.15388/omee.2020.11.35
 
29 Duminy L, Grosser SN. Resilience as basis for sustainability: Shortages in production supply chains for essential consumer goods. Innovative solutions for sustainable supply chains. 2018:223-62.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94322-0_9
 
30 Lee YH, Wei CF, Lee BC, Cheng YY, Chen Y. Consumer brand engagement in the US- China trade war. Asia Pacific J Market Logistic. 2022;34(1):75-90.
https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2020-0162
 
31 Artuc E, Porto G, Rijkers B. Trading off the income gains and the inequality costs of trade policy. J Int Econ. 2019;120:1-45.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2019.05.001
 
32 Fajgelbaum PD, Khandelwal AK. The economic impacts of the US-China trade war. Ann Rev Econ. 2022;14(1):205-28.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-110410
 
33 Fajgelbaum PD, Goldberg PK, Kennedy PJ, Khandelwal AK. The return to protectionism. Quarterly J Econ. 2020;135(1):1-55.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz036
 
34 Autor DH, Dorn D, Hanson GH. The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Ann Rev Econ. 2016;8(1):205-40.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015041
 
35 Özer AC. The effect of the US-China trade war on global trade. In International Trade Policies in the Era of Globalization 2020
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9566-3.ch003
 
(pp. 56-70). IGI Global.
 
36 Aiyar S, Ebeke C. Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Develop. 2020;136:105115.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105115
 
37 Yue J. External coercion and public support: The case of the US-China trade war. J Peace Res. 2020:00223433231221437.
 
38 Meunier S, Roederer-Rynning C. Missing in action? France and the politicization of trade and investment agreements. Politic Govern. 2020;8(1):312-24.
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2616
 
39 Park SC. Trade protectionism as the Achilles Heel of International Cooperation and countermeasures focused on the EU-Japan FTA. Int Organ Res J. 2019;14(2):191-222.
https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-08
 
40 Ploberger C. Political Economic Perspectives of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Reshaping Regional Integration. Routledge. 2019.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429059636
 
41 Alter KJ. Resolving or exacerbating disputes? The WTO’s new dispute resolution system. Int Affair. 2003;79(4):783-800.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00336
 
42 Chatterjee S. US-China trade war and the RCEP negotiations: An analysis. In The China- US Trade War and South Asian Economies 2021 Mar 7 (pp. 175-200). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003053613-14
 
43 Zongyi L. The role of the G20 in resolving deep-rooted problems in the world economy. In China and the Group 20: The Interplay Between a Rising Power and an Emerging Institution 2017
https://doi.org/10.1142/9781938134906_0004
 
(pp. 57-74).
 
44 Papageorgiou MC, Spatafora MN. Economic Diversification in LICs: Stylized Facts and Macroeconomic Implications. International Monetary Fund. 2012.
https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475532180.006
 
45 Miniaoui H, editor. Economic Development in the Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: From Rentier States to Diversified Economies. Springer Nature. 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6058-3
 
46 Juergensen J, Guimón J, Narula R. European SMEs amidst the COVID-19 crisis: assessing impact and policy responses. J Indus Business Econ. 2020;47(3):499-510.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00169-4