Exploring Consciousness: Photon Entanglement and Neural Communication

Giorgi Svanishvili
Anatomical Researches and Skills Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia
Correspondence to: giorgisvanishvili85@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJS.100055

Additional information

• Ethical approval: N/a
• Consent: N/a
• Funding: No industry funding
• Conflicts of interest: N/a
• Author contribution: Giorgi Svanishvili – Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, review and editing
• Guarantor: Giorgi Svanishvili
• Provenance and peer-review:
  Commissioned and externally peer-reviewed
• Data availability statement: N/a

Keywords: Photon entanglement, Neural synchronization, Myelin sheath, Quantum neuroscience, Neurode­generative diseases.

Peer Review
Received: 11 January 2025
Revised: 21 January 2025
Accepted: 28 January 2025
Published: 8 February 2025

Introduction

The intersection of quantum mechanics and consciousness is one of the most compelling frontiers of modern science. As a highly complex system operating at the edge of classical and quantum domains, the brain raises profound questions about the nature of reality and the mechanisms that enable thought, perception, and awareness. While skeptics argue that the warm, decoherent environment of the brain is incompatible with quantum effects,¹ emerging evidence suggests that specific molecular structures or quantum-inspired frameworks may allow for such phenomena (Figure 1).

Quantum cognition, an emerging field of study, investigates the relevance of concepts, such as entanglement, superposition, and non-Boolean logic apply, to cognitive processes.² For instance, the non-commutativity of mental operations mirrors quantum principles, where the sequence of actions affects the outcome. Similarly, the probabilistic nature of quantum events corresponds with the uncertainties and ambiguities inherent in decision-making, perception, and learning. In this study, we investigated how photon entanglement and fast neural communication may bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and consciousness. By exploring the degradation and preservation of entanglement in brain tissue, we aimed to uncover new perspectives on neural synchronization, information processing, and the emergence of conscious experience. Drawing on fields such as neuroscience, quantum physics, and medical diagnostics, this interdisciplinary effort seeks to illuminate how the quantum and classical worlds converge to produce the extraordinary phenomena of the human mind.

Consciousness

Understanding the intricacies of the human brain has historically posed one of the most significant challenges in science and philosophy. The brain is a vast and complex system comprising billions of neurons, astrocytes, glial cells, and axons that interact dynamically to produce behaviors, perceptions, and thoughts. The synchronization of neurons in the cerebral cortex is essential to these functions, serving as a fundamental process for various neurobiological activities.^3–5 Disruptions in this synchronization are associated with neurological disorders like Parkinson’s disease, characterized by a loss of coordinated activity in specific brain regions due to neuronal damage.^6,7 Despite this understanding, the exact mechanisms that govern neural synchronization remain ambiguous, posing a significant challenge for modern neuroscience.⁸

Efforts to explore these mechanisms have necessitated interdisciplinary approaches, drawing on fields such as behavioral science, cognitive science, neuroscience, and quantum physics. Their ability to resolve structures at the micrometer scale, optical spectroscopy, and brain imaging have proven invaluable in studying the brain’s dense networks. These methods rely on the behavior of photons, which interact with biological material in ways that provide crucial information about neuronal architecture and communication. For example, ballistic photons, traveling through thin brain tissue layers, can interact with water and hemoglobin molecules, providing detailed information about the local brain environment.^9,10 Nevertheless, these sophisticated techniques do not completely elucidate how physical processes in the brain generate subjective experiences, rendering consciousness as one of the greatest mysteries of science.

The question of consciousness encompasses observable neural activities and the more abstract aspects of free will, mental intention, and subjective awareness.¹¹ Traditional deterministic frameworks often struggle to consider these phenomena, as they reduce all brain activity to predictable physical laws. However, the brain operates in ways that transcend strict determinism, displaying features such as creativity and intentionality that suggest a deeper, non-classical explanation may be required. This has drawn increasing attention to quantum mechanics, a field known for its ability to describe phenomena that cannot be explained through classical physics alone.

Quantum Mechanics

Quantum physics governs the behavior of matter and energy at atomic and subatomic scales and has changed our knowledge of the physical universe (Figure 2).^12–14 The limitations of classical physics in explaining the brain’s creative and intentional behaviors have prompted researchers to explore quantum mechanics for solutions. Quantum mechanics, through its capacity to elucidate phenomena such as uncertainty and interconnectedness, may offer insights into the brain’s functioning that transcend conventional deterministic models. This shift opens the door to exploring how quantum principles might relate to the processes underlying consciousness.

Central to quantum theory are principles such as wave-particle duality, entanglement, superposition, and uncertainty concepts that challenge classical ­notions of reality.^13,14 Entanglement refers to the phenomenon wherein two particles remain intrinsically connected, such that the state of one instantly ­influences the other, irrespective of the distance between them.¹⁵ To better understand photon entanglement, imagine two particles, specifically photons, which, in this case, are linked such that their states are inherently connected, regardless of their distance. For example, if one entangled coin (photon) is flipped and shows heads, the other coin will simultaneously exhibit tails regardless of distance. This mysterious connection, where the state of one photon immediately influences the other, forms the foundation of entanglement. This phenomenon of nonlocality challenges intuitive understanding and has resulted in significant advancements in quantum information and computation.^16,17

Quantum mechanics has been applied in neuroscience, offering theoretical frameworks to explore phenomena that classical approaches cannot adequately elucidate. Initial propositions, such as the Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) theory by Sir Roger Penrose and Dr. Stuart Hameroff, suggested that consciousness arises from quantum computations occurring within the brain’s microtubules filamentous structures that form part of the cytoskeleton.¹⁸ Another hypothesis proposed by Matthew Fisher posits that nuclear spins in the brain may serve as quantum mediators, facilitating coherence in neural processes.¹⁹ These hypotheses, while speculative, offer exciting prospects for understanding how quantum effects may influence brain function.

The role of photons and their interactions with biological tissues have become an important topic of study. When photons pass through dense media like brain tissue, their behavior is changed by scattering, absorption, and changes in phase or polarization.⁹ Despite these interactions, entangled photons pairs of particles sharing a quantum state have been shown to retain coherence even after traversing brain tissue.⁹ This property has significant implications for neuroscience, as it facilitates the measurement of polarization and coherence to infer the state of the brain at microscopic levels. For example, experiments using 802 nm twin polarization-entangled photons have demonstrated that entanglement can endure brain tissue layers up to 400 μm in thickness.⁹

Photon entanglement offers more than theoretical insight as it provides a practical tool for medical imaging and diagnostics. Entangled photon-based techniques allow researchers to measure quantum states with extraordinary sensitivity, indicating features of biological media that traditional approaches cannot detect. The degradation of entanglement in scattering media quantified through metrics like tangle (T) and linear entropy (S) provides a novel way to study tissue properties and their impact on light propagation.⁹ This feature has inspired novel imaging technologies that utilize increased resolution and coherence of quantum systems, overcoming the classical diffraction limit and enabling sub-wavelength imaging. Building on this core concept, new research has examined how the brain’s unique structure, particularly the myelin sheath surrounding neurons, may facilitate generating and preserving such quantum states.

Physics of Brain

Studying photon entanglement within neural systems represents a paradigm shift in understanding the brain’s complex quantum dynamics. Far from being a classical system, the brain’s unique structures,  particularly the myelin sheath, may act as quantum environments, allowing entangled photon generation and preservation. Based on the vibrational properties of lipids within the myelin sheath, this quantum activity significantly affects neural synchronization and consciousness.

Myelin Sheath: More Than an Insulator

The myelin sheath, a lipid membrane that encases neuronal axons, has traditionally been understood as an insulator facilitating efficient action potential conduction and providing energy to axons (Figure 3).²⁰ However, new evidence reveals that its importance exceeds these traditional functions. Myelin plasticity contributes to neural phase synchronization, a critical process for coherent brain activity.²¹ Notably, damage to the myelin sheath, as observed in neurodegenerative diseases like multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s, disrupts these synchronization mechanisms, linking myelin health to overall brain function.^22,23

Recent studies indicate that the cylindrical cavities formed by the myelin sheath can facilitate quantum phenomena.²³ The vibrational spectrum of C–H bonds in the lipid molecules within these cavities allows the generation of quantum-entangled photon pairs. These pairs are generated through cascade radiation, wherein photons transition from a second excited state to the ground state, a process governed by the quantization of electromagnetic fields within the cylindrical geometry of the myelin sheath.²³

The discrete energy levels within the myelin sheath are determined by its geometry, dictating the conditions for photon entanglement. When the thickness of the myelin sheath falls below 0.45 μm, coupling constants and transition rates become negligible, preventing the generation of biphoton states.²⁴ Conversely, thicker sheaths enable discrete electromagnetic modes to align with vibrational frequencies, such as ω10 and ω21, facilitating strong entanglement.²⁴ These unique properties distinguish photon cascade radiation within the myelin sheath from that in free space, where continuous modes and narrow line widths dominate. The formation and accessibility of entanglement depend entirely on the geometry of the myelin sheath. Discrete electromagnetic modes, located on both sides of vibrational frequencies ω10 and ω21, can induce significant entanglement due to the indistinguishable nature of photons.²⁴ Conversely, when a mode precisely corresponds to these frequencies, the entanglement entropy is minimized. The coupling constant, transition rates, and vibrational energy levels ensure the entanglement mechanism is highly efficient within the myelin cavity.²⁴

In practical terms, the thickness of the myelin sheath plays a crucial role in photon entanglement and neural synchronization. Strong entanglement enables efficient communication between neurons in areas where the sheath is thick, supporting complex processes like cognition and consciousness. Conversely, entanglement weakens when the sheath is too thin due to aging, diseases, or naturally thin regions like unmyelinated axons or nodes of Ranvier, disrupting synchronization and impairing cognitive functions. Areas characterized by naturally thin or absent myelin, such as the peripheral nervous system or autonomic pathways, are typically not involved in consciousness.^25,26 These areas handle simpler tasks like pain perception or autonomic regulation, where synchronization is less critical. This implies that thicker myelin sheaths may be essential in brain regions where consciousness and complex integration of information are required, linking myelin integrity to the brain’s quantum-based communication processes.

Experimental Evidence of Photon Entanglement in Neural Tissue

Experiments examining photon entanglement within biological tissues have interesting new insights.²⁷ Using rat brain slices, including the cortex and brainstem, researchers measured entanglement preservation as photons passed through different tissues. Quantum state tomography was used to analyze the entangled photons using optical elements such as quarter-wave plates, half-wave plates, and Glan-Thompson polarizers.^27,28

The results showed that brain tissues with a thickness of up to 400 μm preserved entanglement remarkably well.⁹ For instance, in cortical tissues, fidelity measurements reached 0.957, with a linear entropy of 0.010 and a tangle of 0.987, indicating a near-maximally entangled state. Comparatively, non-neural tissues like kidney slices exhibited significantly reduced entanglement preservation, reflecting the unique structural and quantum properties of neural networks.⁹ Additionally, the ability of myelin polariton (MP) systems to resist thermal fluctuations further enhances the stability of entanglement. Like cold-atom ensembles used in quantum memories, myelin-based systems may protect entanglement over extended regions, allowing quantum communication across neural networks.^26,29 The complex structure of the brain, composed of dense neural trees and water-filled voids, is crucial in channeling photon polarization and coherence. This ensures high entanglement (measured by tangle, T) and low entropy (S) compared to other tissues, making the brain an exceptional medium for studying quantum effects. Using photons with a wavelength of 802 nm, appropriate for the brain’s near-infrared optical window, decreased scattering and absorption, helping researchers to accurately measure quantum states.⁹

The results suggest that quantum mechanics may operate within the brain through eigenvalue paths uniquely suited for photon transfer.⁹ These pathways, dictated by the brain’s structural and vibrational ­properties, could provide the basis for neural synchronization, a critical process underlying cognitive functions. The nonlocal correlations inherent in photon entanglement offer a potential mechanism for resolving the longstanding puzzle of how neuronal activity achieves phase coherence across the brain.⁹ Moreover, the differential preservation of entanglement in healthy versus pathological tissues offers potential for medical applications. In diseased states such as neurodegeneration, reduced entanglement coherence may serve as a diagnostic biomarker (Figure 4). Future imaging techniques leveraging entangled photons could enable the detection of subtle structural and functional changes in neural tissue, thereby enhancing early diagnosis and personalized treatments for brain disorders.

Potential Applications

Studying photon entanglement in the brain holds significant implications for understanding consciousness, a phenomenon that has long puzzled neuroscientists, physicists, and philosophers. The distinctive ability of entangled photons to promote large-scale neuronal synchronization suggests a viable mechanism for information integration, a characteristic of conscious experience. Quantum entanglement may provide the brain with an effective method for joining distant ­neural regions, facilitating activities like attention, perception, and memory consolidation, all of which are necessary components of consciousness. The potential for photon entanglement to reveal the physical correlates of consciousness is particularly exciting. Researchers could explore how neural synchronization relates to conscious states by measuring entanglement levels in various brain regions. For example, a future diagnostic device could use entangled photons to map brain regions where coherence is disrupted during cognitive tasks, revealing areas associated with attention lapses or altered perception in real time. Such a tool could allow clinicians to observe how consciousness shifts during transitions like falling asleep, entering deep meditation, or emerging from anesthesia. This could also enable the identification of disruptions in quantum coherence that may underlie consciousness disorders, such as coma or vegetative states.

Regarding imaging, entangled photons provide a unique opportunity to observe the brain in action. Unlike traditional imaging techniques, which ­provide static snapshots or coarse-resolution data, quantum-based imaging has the potential to capture the real-time dynamics of neural activity with high precision. Imagine an advanced neural scanner visualizing quantum connections between neurons during complex problem-solving or emotional states. Such a gadget could help neuroscientists interpret neural synchronization patterns related to creative thinking or emotional states. This approach may reveal the interplay between neural circuits during moments of conscious awareness, potentially shedding light on the neural foundation of subjective experience.

Furthermore, photon entanglement has diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Changes in myelin thickness, which correlate with aging and neurodegenerative diseases, may impact the generation and propagation of entangled photons. This relationship could serve as a biomarker for conditions like Alzheimer’s, offering new ways to monitor disease progression and evaluate treatment efficacy. For instance, a wearable device could monitor entanglement efficiency, signaling early signs of myelin deterioration in patients at risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Therapeutically, interventions targeting the quantum coherence of ­neural networks could help restore disrupted ­synchronization, improving cognitive function and potentially enhancing conscious awareness. In a futuristic scenario, quantum-based neural interfaces could leverage these entangled connections to enhance human cognitive abilities. Such devices might amplify memory retrieval by improving coherence across distant brain regions or allow immersive experiences by synchronizing external inputs with the brain’s quantum activity.

Limitations

Despite its exciting potential, applying photon entanglement to understanding consciousness faces several significant challenges. The warm and noisy environment of the brain poses challenges for maintaining quantum coherence. Thermal fluctuations and interactions with other molecular systems, like vibronic ensembles, lead to decoherence, which disrupts entanglement. For instance, although the myelin sheath offers a stable cavity to facilitate entanglement, it remains uncertain how long photons can preserve coherence in the intricate biochemical landscape of living tissue. Future studies should concentrate on comprehending the specific conditions that facilitate sustained entanglement in vivo.

The existing models of photon entanglement in the myelin sheath are overly simplistic. Critical factors are often overlooked, including the coupling of photons to polaritons and various molecular interactions, resulting in an incomplete depiction of the true dynamics of neural tissue. Failing to address these gaps leaves the practical application of these findings in speculation. Integrating these interactions into computational models could enhance the simulation of real-world conditions and improve predictions regarding the behavior of entanglement in specific neural environments. Technological barriers further limit the translation of these findings into clinical or research settings. While polarization-state tomography has demonstrated photon entanglement in rat brain tissue, scaling this technique for human brains or non-invasive applications remains a significant challenge. Thus, advanced optics and precise instrumentation are required to measure entanglement without interfering with neural activity, but these tools are not yet accessible for widespread use.

While promising, the relationship between myelin thickness, entanglement strength, and neurodegenerative diseases is still poorly understood. For example, as myelin thins with age or disease, entanglement weakens, potentially disrupting neural synchronization. However, individual differences in neural architecture make it difficult to develop universal diagnostic tools. A method effective for one individual may produce inconsistent results for another, complicating its application in clinical diagnostics. Ethical considerations present another critical ^­challenge, particularly in using quantum-based technologies to monitor or manipulate neural activity and consciousness. If such tools were developed, they could potentially influence synchronization in the brain, altering cognitive processes or emotional states. This raises serious concerns about autonomy and consent. For instance, who would have the right to control or access a technology that affects someone’s conscious experience? Moreover, privacy risks are amplified when brain activity can be measured or modified at such a precise level. These technologies could be misused for coercion, surveillance, or unethical behavioral modifications in the wrong hands. Establishing strict ethical guidelines and oversight mechanisms will be essential before such applications are considered.

Conclusions

Photon entanglement in the brain provides a novel perspective on neuronal synchronization and consciousness. With its ability to support quantum entanglement, the myelin sheath may facilitate coherent neural communication, linking distant brain regions and contributing to unified cognitive processes. This mechanism has transformative potential for advanced brain imaging, early diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, and innovative therapies targeting disrupted neural synchronization. However, challenges such as the brain’s specific environment, limitations of current models, and technological constraints must be addressed. The ethical implications of manipulating neural processes introduce additional complexity. Despite these hurdles, the intersection of quantum mechanics and neuroscience represents an exciting frontier that may reshape our understanding of the brain and consciousness.

References

1 Rosa L, Faber J. Quantum models of mind: Are they compatible with environment decoherence? Phys Rev E. 2004;70:031902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.031902
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.031902
 
2 Bruza PD, Fell L, Hoyte P, Dehdashti S, Obeid A, Gibson A, et al. Contextuality and context-sensitivity in probabilistic models of cognition. Cogn Psychol. 2023;140:101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101529
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101529
 
3 Schnitzler A, Gross J. Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:285-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1650
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1650
 
4 Singer W. Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55:349-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025
 
5 Gansel KS. A new perspective on the organization of neuronal activity in the neocortex and its implications for neuronal information processing and coding. Dissertation. University of Oldenburg. 2014.
 
6 Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Neural synchrony in brain disorders: Relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron. 2006;52:155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.020
 
7 Wang Z, Liu Z. A brief review of chimera state in empirical brain networks. Front Physiol. 2020;11:724.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00724
 
8 Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘orch or’ theory. Phys Life Rev. 2014;11:39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002
 
9 Shi L, Galvez E, Alfano R. Photon entanglement through brain tissue. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37714. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37714
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37714
 
10 Sordillo LA, Pu Y, Prataviera S, Budansky Y, Alfano RR. Deep optical imaging using the second and third spectra window. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19:056004.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.5.056004
 
11 Kane, Robert (1996). The Significance of Free Will. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA or Müller, Thomas, and Briegel, Hans (2016) Stochastic libertarianism: How to maintain integrity in action without determinism. https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/12946 (accessed 2025-02-05).
 
12 Popper KR, Eccles JC. The Self and Its Brain. Springer-Verlag. 1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61891-8
 
13 Chalmers DJ. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press. 1996.
 
14 Pauen M. Painless pain: Property dualism and the causal role of phenomenal consciousness. Am Philo Quarter. 2000;37(1):51-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009984
 
15 Horodecki R, Horodecki P, Horodecki M, Horodecki K. Quantum entanglement. Rev Modern Phys. 2009;81(2):865-942. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
 
16 Giustina M, Versteegh MAM, Wengerowsky S, Handsteiner J, Hochrainer A, Phelan K, et al. Significant-loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115:250401.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401
 
17 Shalm LK, Meyer-Scott E, Christensen BG, Bierhorst P, Wayne MA, Stevens MJ, et al. Strong loophole-free test of local realism. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115:250402.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402
 
18 Hameroff S, Penrose R. Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. Math Comput Simul. 1996;40(3-4):453-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4754(96)80476-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4754(96)80476-9
 
19 Quantum cognition: The possibility of processing with nuclear spins in the brain. Neuron Cogn. 2015;362:593-602. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.05929
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2015.08.020
 
20 Stadelmann C, Timmler S, Barrantes-Freer A, Simons M. Myelin in the central nervous system: Structure, function, and pathology. Physiol Rev. 2019;99:1381. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2018
https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2018
 
21 Pajevic S, Basser PJ, Fields RD. Role of myelin plasticity in oscillations and synchrony of neuronal activity. Neuroscience. 2014;276:135-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.007
 
22 Knowles JK, Batra A, Xu H, Monje M. Adaptive and maladaptive myelination in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022;18:735-46. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00737-3
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-022-00737-3
 
23 Bonetto G, onetto G, Belin D, Káradóttir RT. Myelin: A gatekeeper of activity-dependent circuit plasticity? Science. 2021;374:eaba6905. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6905
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba6905
 
24 Liu Z, Chen YC, Ao P. Entangled biphoton generation in the myelin sheath. Phys Rev E. 2024;110(2):024402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024402
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.024402
 
25 Betts JG, Desaix P, Johnson E, Johnson JE, Korol O, Kruse D, et al. Anatomy & Physiology. OpenStax CNX. 2023 (15.1 Divisions of the autonomic nervous system. ISBN: 978-1-947172-04-3).
 
26 Garbay B, Heape AM, Sargueil F, Cassagne C. Myelin synthesis in the peripheral nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;61(3):267-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-0082(99)00049-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00049-0
 
27 James DFV, Kwiat PG, Munro WJ, White AG. Measurement of qubits. Phys Rev A. 2001;64:052312.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052312
 
28 Adelpeter JB, James DFV, Kwiat PG. Qubit quantum state tomography. In Quantum State Estimation 2004;(Vol. 649, pp.113-45).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-44481-7_4
 
29 Hill RA, Li AM, Grutzendler J. Lifelong cortical myelin plasticity and age-related degeneration in the live mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:683-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0120-6
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0120-6

Cite this article as:
Svanishvili G. Exploring Consciousness: Photon Entanglement and Neural Communication. Premier Journal of Science 2025;7:100055

Export to EndNote Export to Mendeley