Sazin Islam
Department of Public Health, First Capital University of Bangladesh, Chuadanga, Bangladesh
Correspondence to: mail2sazin@gmail.com
Additional information
- Ethical approval: N/a
- Consent: N/a
- Funding: No industry funding
- Conflicts of interest: N/a
- Author contribution: Sazin Islam – Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, review and editing
- Guarantor: Sazin Islam
- Provenance and peer-review:
Commissioned and externally peer-reviewed - Data availability statement: N/a
Keywords: Post-Brexit migration, UK labor market, Low-skilled worker shortages, Non-EU immigration, Immigration policy reform.
Peer Review
Received: 27 October 2024
Revised: 2 November 2024
Accepted: 20 November 2024
Published: 3 December 2024
Abstract
This article shows the post-Brexit migration trends and their effect on the labor market in the UK. There are substantial changes in the workforce due to the end of free movement between the UK and the European Union (EU). The main findings of this study show that the number of low-skilled workers from the EU has significantly decreased during this period. Non-EU immigration partially offsets this, leading to significant labor shortages in the agriculture, hospitality, and construction industries. On the other hand, highly skilled sectors thrive with non-EU labor. This review also sheds light on the policies and economic challenges during this transition period. Additionally, the impact of Brexit on the UK’s social, cultural, and ethical stability, particularly in research, highlights the need for policy reforms. These reforms include the removal of visa restrictions for workers with lower skill levels, the adoption of technological solutions to bridge the skills gap, and theoretical solutions to mitigate workforce gaps. Future research should concentrate on regional disparities and the long-term sectoral effects of effective migration policies.
Introduction
Post-Brexit migration systems have significantly impacted the UK labor market. The new migration policies have resulted in a reduction in European Union (EU) migrant workers. This has resulted in a significant labor shortage in lower-skilled sectors. The post-Brexit migration system has drawn non-EU workers to higher-skilled sectors. This has led to a rise in labor costs, which will have significant impacts on the economy. The theory of economics changes over time. It depends on society, people, government, or needs.1,2 Based on this, workers from foreign countries migrate to different countries in search of money. This is the current configuration of the international labor market. This structure integrates both instrumental and intrinsic dimensions of migration. This framework also elucidates the positive and negative shifts that influence migratory behavior.3 These labor market migrations are primarily driven by low-contribution and low-skilled positions. People in developed countries are reluctant to do this. That is why workers are recruited from less developed countries. Who benefits from this high income? And this maintains the flow of migration.4 Brexit has significantly impacted the social, cultural, and ethical stability of the UK, particularly in its traditional aspects. Through this review, we will discuss the current state of the UK labor market postmigration and the problems facing its various centers. It will show how to change some policies to avoid social and economic losses. It will also give directions for future research.
Theoretical Framework
Post-Brexit policy changes have had a major impact on the UK labor market and its structure. The emergence of post-Brexit and the cessation of free movement have led to a massive shortage of low-skilled workers. Employers could force these individuals to accept low-paying jobs. This low-wage labor market was crucial to the UK economy because it allowed for more production at lower cost. Now that the demand for non-EU workers is increasing due to policy changes, UK immigration laws have restricted the arrival of such workers. Their qualifications and linguistic skills need to catch up. As a result, both parties are facing huge economic losses.5 Due to this, the labor crisis has intensified in certain sectors (such as agriculture, construction, etc.). Although the highly skilled labor market is as stable as ever, demand is growing. The production cost has also increased. The annual economic growth is being negatively impacted.6 It demonstrates the intricate relationship between labor market dynamics and immigration policy. Immigration restrictions exacerbate labor market barriers and economic inequality, particularly in the post-Brexit period.
The UK economy has seen significant changes due to post-Brexit immigration policies. These policies have had a significant impact on various sectors, including the labor market. These policies have imposed restrictions on the free movement of EU workers and changes in labor supply. These have also affected the economy both positively and negatively. Historically, immigrants have contributed to GDP growth. Its demand continues even after Brexit. However, the extent to which the new policy restrictions will affect the UK economy will depend on several specific factors. Sectors dependent on low-skilled EU labor are facing major challenges. However, high-skilled sectors are keeping the economy moving by increasing visa issuance for non-EU workers.7 These immigration changes result in a mixed fiscal impact. Although there is a positive impact on the national economy, there is a negative impact at the local level. Expenditures such as public education have created additional pressures for immigrant children. The labor supply, as well as the wage structure and employment rates of various local populations, has been impacted.8 Although the changes are subtle, their impact on the future will be far-reaching. The majority of these changes are anticipated to have detrimental effects. This will complicate both immigration and economic policies.
Post-Brexit Migration Trends
After Brexit, the number of EU citizens arriving in the UK has fallen significantly in recent days. According to Office for National Statistics (ONS) projections released in May 2023, the long-term net migration of EU residents to the UK was negative in the year ending December 2022, at −51,000. Following the start of the pandemic, net migration from the EU started to decline in 2020 and continued to do so in 2021 and 2022 (Figure 1). This has resulted in a shortfall of around 460,000 EU workers. The arrival of approximately 130,000 non-EU workers partially filled this shortfall. Most of them come from countries like India and Nigeria. These immigrants are working mainly in high-skilled sectors and education. Employment-related migration now accounts for 41% of total migration. However, 91% of these workers come from non-EU countries. This indicates a fundamental shift in the source of labor in the UK economy.9 The UK will experience both far-reaching positive and negative effects from its policies. EU immigration has fallen since the 2016 referendum. The UK government imposed strict conditions on EU citizens after the election. EU immigration has decreased by 70% compared to the pre-Brexit period (data from the Office for National Statistics). On the other hand, non-EU immigration has increased due to the policy changes. These migrants are mainly entering the UK with either work visas or student visas.10
Source: Migration Observatory analysis of ONS data.
This change has had a huge impact on the health sector. The number of non-EU workers in this sector has increased. An increase in the number of non-EU workers has not alleviated the labor market crisis. An increase in non-EU nationals visiting the UK was the main factor driving the increase in total net migration. Throughout the 2010s, non-EU net migration steadily rose, reaching over 190,000 in 2019. The epidemic caused a temporary decline in 2020, but it has subsequently seen a significant increase. The epidemic reached its peak in 2022 and experienced a slight decline in 2023, yet it remained significantly higher than historical averages. According to ONS projections, there were two primary reasons for the 660,000 rise in non-EU migration between 2019 and 2023 (Figure 2). EU workers’ departure from the UK causes the crisis. The crisis has long-term effects on important industries. This issue is a cause of considerable concern. Brexit is changing the UK’s migrant population structure. It is changing the economy. It is time to reassess the immigration laws.11
Source: Migration Observatory analysis of ONS data.
The number of EU migrants to the UK experienced a sharp decline, following Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic. This significant labor shortage has started in the agriculture and construction sectors. These sectors were previously dependent on a steady flow of low-skilled EU workers.2 On the other hand, non-EU immigration has increased in high-skilled sectors (such as technology and healthcare). This has partially addressed the problem of the migrant labor shortage. The post-Brexit immigration regime prioritizes skilled labor through the visa route. This has led to a significant division in the labor market based on different sectors. At pre-Brexit levels, highly skilled sectors have the capacity to draw in foreign talent. New visa regimes haven’t replaced immigration to low-skilled sectors. These sectoral differences indicate the uneven impact of Brexit on the UK labor market. Supplementary research using aggregated data from Eurostat and conventional sources also found that some regions of the UK experienced greater changes in migration and border crossing than others.12
Implications for the UK Labor Market
Involuntary vacancies have emerged for the first time in the UK.1 The lack of workers in the healthcare sector has led to a decline in service delivery. It is clear that the economy and other sectors are hurting. Production costs increased, and production decreased. The overall economic recovery is also hampered.2 Brexit has brought about significant changes to wages and working conditions in the UK labor market.13,14 This has resulted in major changes in labor supply and demand (Figure 3). Labor shortages in the healthcare and construction sectors have led to rising wages. However, this growth is not equal in all sectors.15 Workers are benefiting from higher wages. But the resulting pressure has worsened the working environment in various sectors. The workplace is experiencing a manpower shortage, which is leading to an increase in the workload for employees. They are forced to work long hours and also face job security. Even if wage growth occurs, it often comes at the cost of overall job satisfaction.2 Brexit has observed a complex interplay of supply and demand for skilled and unskilled labor. The labor crisis has emerged as a major challenge.16 Employers in various sectors are struggling to fill vacancies. Reliance on temporary labor exposes economical and structural vulnerabilities. However, immigration policies for skilled labor markets have been somewhat supportive of skilled migrants. This has helped in stabilizing the flow of talent into these sectors.15
Source: Office for National Statistics – Vacancy Survey and Labor Force Survey (LFS).
In terms of imports, the UK saw a sharp drop in imports from the EU during the first few months of 2021, despite the delayed implementation of Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) measures. This was in stark contrast to an increase in imports of products from non-EU nations (Figure 4, panels a and c). This suggests a partial substitution of imports from the EU and non-EU, as products are bypassing transit through EU nations. However, distinct exposures to global supply constraints and varying cycle circumstances during the pandemic (due to variations in case numbers and limits) may have played a significant role. All of these variables seem to have had a rather short-lived effect since the difference between imports from EU and non-EU partners has narrowed in recent months. Following the TCA’s implementation, UK exports to EU nations saw a precipitous decline as many exporters found it difficult to comply with the additional documentation requirements for proving adherence to EU standards (Figure 4, panel b). Following that, UK exports of products to the EU saw a modest recovery and have since generally followed exports to non-EU partners, although they remain somewhat muted in comparison to pre-Brexit patterns (Figure 4, panel d). Brexit continues to be a significant influence. The British Chambers of Commerce conducted a recent study of over 1100 companies to commemorate two years after the signing of the TCA, and 77% of these companies said that the agreement was not assisting them in growing their operations or increasing sales. Over 50% of the businesses said they had trouble adjusting to the new export regulations for products (45% for services) (Figure 4).
Source: ONS data.
Since the entry into force of the EU-UK TCA, trade has fallen in terms of both imports and exports. Due to this, the existing challenges of economic growth and the labor market are becoming more complex.15 Productivity has declined in sectors dependent on migrant labor. UK labor productivity has been extremely weak. Hourly production has shown an annual growth rate of only 0.2% over the past decade.17
Policy Responses and Government Strategies
The UK has tried to balance the economy by reforming immigration laws after Brexit, aiming to reduce public anxiety. The EU-UK TCA led to the introduction of stricter controls in the UK’s new immigration system. Due to this, the number of immigrants has decreased.18 Employers have emphasized the need for both low-skilled and high-skilled immigrants. It will help sustain productivity and growth in the healthcare, hospitality, and construction sectors. A points-based system prioritizes skilled workers. But restrictions on low-skilled immigration have tightened. This approach aims to attract talent to high-demand sectors. But this has led to labor shortages in low-wage sectors. Therefore, the UK labor market requires more policy coordination to maintain its competitiveness and stability19 Employers in a variety of industries have benefited from automation and technological advancements. Automation and technological advancements have increased its use, particularly in labor-intensive and low-wage occupations.20 We are taking steps to hire indigenous workers. These steps include creating more flexible work schedules, improving training opportunities, and providing competitive salaries. These changes are essential in the short term. However, over time, these changes could potentially exacerbate the disparity in job opportunities for individuals with lower skill levels.21 Agencies such as the US Government Accountability Office are trying to develop the DEIA.
Similarly, staff inclusion is also commendable. This will lead to a shortage of skills and maintain a balance in the workforce. The UK is trying to adapt to technological and policy changes, dealing with post-Brexit challenges. A stable labor market is also necessary for the future. A major policy challenge is improving economic productivity. In addition to this, the government must also address public concerns about immigration. Globally, digital governance and automation are gaining popularity. But there are also some obstacles. Recent studies have shown that the lack of technical expertise within government structures is an important constraint. This constraint is making the effective implementation of digital governance strategies increasingly complex. Efforts are underway to modernize public services to improve labor market performance.22 Future policy frameworks should be more flexible. There is an emerging need to incorporate demand-based approaches in the public health and labor sectors.23
Comparative Insights: Lessons from other Countries
Subsequent migration policies of the EU mirror the complex governance structures of other countries. The EU bases its migration policies on crisis management and national security. After the refugee crisis of 2015–2016, many countries adopted crisis-oriented immigration policies. These policies have generally emerged as individual reforms rather than comprehensive reforms.24 In the EU, member states prioritize national security over human security. There is a lack of consensus among countries. As a result, immigration and asylum policies across the region are inconsistent and contradictory.25 The UK is concentrating on developing predictive markets to enhance the accuracy of forecasts. The UK is also prioritizing timeliness by utilizing crowd-sourced insights.26 Also, geopolitical events, such as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have shown how public opinion toward immigrants can change quickly. These cases increase support for restrictive asylum policies. Slovakia shows how external crises can influence migration policy choices. These genes are specific to the UK.27
Future Directions and Challenges
Changing work systems are having long-term effects on the labor market. Productivity has increased due to flexible working arrangements (FWAs), as well as increased job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Governments also need to be resilient to reap the full benefits of FWAs.28 Another factor contributing to the labor market crisis is the aging population. The labor crisis requires increasing labor participation to remove obstacles to long-term economic growth. We need strategic interventions to maintain the resilience and productivity of the labor market.29 Forecasting future migration trends is a challenging task. The factors that lead to migration are intricate and multifaceted. These factors include economic conditions, political shifts, environmental crises, and conflicts. Despite the use of various models to forecast migration flows, these models make accurate predictions difficult.30 The studies emphasize a deeper understanding of the structure and motivation of migration flows. This is because immigration policymakers interact with each other in multiple ways.31 Post-Brexit migration trends reveal research gaps, especially in terms of understanding the long-term impact on specific sectors, regional disparities, and policy effectiveness, impacting on regional labor markets. There is limited empirical research on the social and cultural impact of reduced EU immigration. There is also a dearth of research on the role of non-EU migrants in addressing the labor crisis. Bridging these gaps is critical to effective immigration policymaking. We also need research to ensure the effective use of technology and automation in addressing the labor crisis.
Conclusion
While high-skilled businesses have been able to attract foreign workers through non-EU migration routes, this shift has led to labor shortages in low-skilled sectors such as agriculture, hospitality, and construction industries. Urgent policy changes are necessary, given the differences in EU and non-EU migration trends and the resulting labor shortages. Post-Brexit migration trends have had a significant impact on the UK labor market, particularly in sectors that rely on EU workers. EU immigration has declined due to the points-based immigration system, which has led to labor shortages in low-skilled sectors such as agriculture, hospitality, and construction industries. Policymakers need to address these issues by easing visa requirements for low-skilled workers and encouraging technological solutions to reduce reliance on migrant labor.
References
1 Portes J, Springford J. The impact of the post-Brexit migration system on the UK labour market. Contemp Soc Sci. 2023;18(2):132-49.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2023.2192516
2 Portes J. Immigration and the UK economy after Brexit. Oxford Rev Econ Policy. 2022;38(1):82-96. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grab045
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grab045
3 de Haas H. A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. Comp Migr Stud. 2021;9(1):8.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4
4 Rauhut D, Aigner-Walder B, Schomaker RM. Economic theory and migration. In: The Economics of Immigration Beyond the Cities. Springer. 2023. p. 21-50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30968-7_2
5 Dorn D, Zweimüller J. Migration and labor market integration in Europe. J Econ Perspect. 2021;35(2):49-76.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.35.2.49
6 Schieckoff B, Sprengholz M. The labor market integration of immigrant women in Europe: context, theory, and evidence. SN Soc Sci. 2021;1(276):1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00279-3
7 Blau FD, Hunt J. The economic and fiscal consequences of immigration. Bus Econ. 2019;54(3):173-6.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-019-00132-9
8 Caiumi A, Peri G. Immigration’s effect on US wages and employment redux. NBER Working Paper No. 32389. 2024.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w32389
9 Palmer N. Post-Brexit UK Migration Trends and Record Highs. Brunel University London. 2024.
10 Cuibus MV. EU Migration to and from the UK. Migration Observatory. 2023. Available from: https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/eu-migration- to-and-from-the-uk/
11 Sumption M, Walsh PW, Brindle B. Net migration to the UK. Migration Observatory. 2024. Available from: https://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/net- migration-to-the-uk/
12 Sîrbu A, Goglia D, Kim J, Magos PM, Pollacci L, Spyratos S, et al. International mobility between the UK and Europe around Brexit: A data-driven study. J Comput Soc Sci. 2024;7:1451-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024- 00212-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00277-4
13 Office for National Statistics. Changing trends and recent shortages in the labour market, UK: 2016 to 2021. (Internet). 2021. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandempl oyeetypes/articles/changing trendsandrecentshortagesinthelabourmarketuk/2016to2021
14 Smith J. Changes in the UK labour market from 2019 to 2022 – our new report. (Internet). Prime Econ. 2022. Available from: https://primeeconomics.org/articles/changes-in-the-uk-labour-market-from-2019-to-2022- our-new-report/
15 Forster-van Aerssen K, Spital T. The impact of Brexit on UK trade and labour markets. ECB Econ Bull. 2023;3:1-25. Available from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic- bulletin/articles/2023/html/ecb.ebart202303_01~3af23c5f5a.en.html
16 Davies G. Addressing Skills and Labour Shortages Post-Brexit. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. 2021. Available from: https://www.cipd.org/globalassets/media/knowledge/knowledge-hub/reports/addressing- skills-labour-shortages-post-brexit_tcm18-102313.pdf
17 Wales P. The anatomy of UK labour productivity: Lessons from new and existing data sources. Natl Inst Econ Rev. 2020. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/national-institute-economic- review/article/abs/anatomy-of-uk-labour-productivity-lessons-from-new-and-existing- data-sources/2662667DD3A6CFF2784F8E48C19032B6
18 Rolfe H, Runge J, Hudson-Sharp N. Immigration policy from post-war to post-Brexit: how new immigration policy can reconcile public attitudes and employer preferences. J Migration Policy. 2024;48(2):123-45.
19 Zotti A. The immigration policy of the United Kingdom: British exceptionalism and the renewed quest for control. In: The EU Migration System of Governance. Springer. 2024. p. 57-88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53997-9_3
20 Carlson MJ, Wimer C, Haskins R. Changing work, changing families, and public policies toward low-income families. RSF: Russell Sage Foundation J Soc Sci. 2022;8(5):1-22. doi:10.7758/RSF.2022.8.5.01.
https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.5.01
21 U.S. Government Accountability Office. Federal Workforce: Strengthening Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility. GAO-23-106254. 2023 Jan 24. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106254
22 Idzi FM, Gomes RC. Digital governance: government strategies that impact public services. Glob Public Policy Gov. 2022;2:427-52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00055-w
23 Shvetsova O, VanDusky-Allen J, Zhirnov A, Adeel AB, Catalano M, et al. Federal institutions and strategic policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Polit Sci. 2021;3:631363.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.631363
24 Sahin-Mencutek Z, Barthoma S, Gökalp-Aras NE, Triandafyllidou A. A crisis mode in migration governance: Comparative and analytical insights. Comp Migr Stud. 2022;10:12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-022-00284-2
25 Estevens J. Migration crisis in the EU: Developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies. Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6:28.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-018-0093-3
26 Morgenstern S, Strijbis O. Forecasting migration movements using prediction markets. Comp Migr Stud. 2024;12:45.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00404-0
27 Adamus M, Grežo M. Attitudes towards migrants and preferences for asylum and refugee policies before and during the Russian invasion of Ukraine: The case of Slovakia. Comp Migr Stud. 2024;12:44.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-024-00405-z
28 Vohra V, Singh S, Dutta T. Embracing flexibility post-COVID-19: a systematic review of flexible working arrangements using the SCM-TBFO framework. Glob J Flex Syst Manag. 2023;25:1-26.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00366-9
29 Madgavkar A, White O. Labor markets are still tight. It’s a long-term issue, and not just in the US. McKinsey Global Institute. 2024. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/overview/in-the-news/labor-markets-are-still-tight-its-a- long-term-issue-and-not-just-in-the-us
30 de Valk HAG, Acostamadiedo E, Guan Q, Melde S, Mooyaart J, Sohst RR, et al. How to predict future migration: different methods explained and compared. In: de Valk HAG, Acostamadiedo E, Guan Q, Melde S, Mooyaart J, Sohst RR, Tjaden J, editors. Introduction to Migration Studies. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer. 2022. pp. 463-82.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8_28
31 Boissonneault M, de Jong PW. Estimating future migration flows under social and environmental scenarios taking into account interactions: insights from a survey among migration scholars. Front Hum Dyn. 2022;4:897562.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.897562
