Global Warming and Plant Fluctuation: Untangling Complex Environmental Interactions

Saira Sameen¹ , Kausar Hussain Shah², Iqra Khalil1 and M. Bilal Khalil¹
1. Department of Life Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
2. Institute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
Correspondence to: sairasameen294@gmail.com

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70389/PJPB.100009

Additional information

• Ethical approval: N/a
• Consent: N/a
• Funding: No industry funding
• Conflicts of interest: N/a
• Author contribution: Saira Sameen, Kausar Hussain Shah, Iqra Khalil and M. Bilal Khalil  – Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, review and editing
• Guarantor: Saira Sameen
• Provenance and peer-review:
  Commissioned and externally peer-reviewed
• Data availability statement: N/a

Keywords: Climate change, Plant physiology, Phenological shifts, Soil Microbiome, Biodiversity crisis.

Peer Review
Received: 18 October 2024
Revised: 15 January 2025
Accepted: 16 January 2025
Published: 29 January 2025

Introduction

A high venture for plant productivity and the sustainability of agriculture is global warming. Changing environmental conditions affect plants’ ability to develop, grow, and reproduce because of the earth’s rising temperature and increasingly unpredictable weather situations. One of the troubles is understanding the complex relationships between global warming and the distinct abiotic and biotic factors that influence plant performance. Many factors, which include shifting styles of precipitation and snowmelt, rising sea ranges, stronger storms and wet weather, and changes to the makeup and distribution of vegetation and species, can all have an impact on vegetation due to weather trade.¹ These adjustments in the environment will have a domino impact on the body structure of plant life, resulting in misfolded protein accumulation and disturbances in protein folding, both of which can be acknowledged to be dangerous to the health of plants. Furthermore, the frequency of severe weather occasions like warmth waves and droughts has elevated, which can notably limit plant output and increase.² Global warming ultimately results in disturbed ecosystem (Figure 1).

Advances in bioinformatics and molecular biology have completely changed our information regarding plants’ responses to abiotic stimuli linked to changing weather conditions. By adapting multi-omics techniques, scientists are primarily focusing on the complex regulatory networks and signaling pathways that manipulate plant reactions to environmental stresses. These incorporated omics analyses, which study the interplay between genes, transcripts, proteins, epigenomes, and metabolic approaches, have supplied treasured insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying plant responses to stresses consisting of drought, heat, and salinity.³

Methodology

The methodology for this evaluation paper involved a comprehensive literature search from 2010 to 2023 and a synthesis of modern studies on the influences of global warming on plant biology. Key databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, have been utilized to perceive applicable research published in the last 10 years that specialize in topics such as plant responses to abiotic stresses, phenological shifts, and soil microbiome interactions. The selection standards prioritized peer-reviewed articles that supplied empirical information or theoretical insights into how global warming influences plant morphology, reproductive success, and ecosystem dynamics. To collect conclusions about precise climate variables, such as temperature and precipitation fluctuations, statistics extraction was performed. With the intention of recognizing the molecular mechanisms due to plant responses to environmental stresses, the review also covered multi-omics strategies.

As shown in Table 1, numerous weather stressors considerably affect the botanical ecosystem, highlighting key effects, together with alterations in physiological functions, changes in morphological patterns, and disruptions in ecological interactions. Each climate stressor, which includes rising temperatures, drought strain, and extended CO2 stages, is related to specific consequences that may affect plant growth, productivity, and biodiversity. This comprehensive review serves as a precious reference for expertise in the complex relationships between global warming and plant biology.

Table 1: Impact of climate stressors and adaptive strategies on plant ecosystem.
Sr. No.	Climate Stressor	Impacts on Plant Ecosystems
1.	Rising Temperatures	Alters plant features. Disrupts photosynthesis and water metabolism. Induces heat strain.5–7
2.	Drought Stress	Reduces growth and productivity. Threatens crop yields.2
3.	Increased CO2 Levels	Can improve growth. Outcomes can be negated by means of drought and heat.3
4.	Extreme Weather Events	Causes waterlogging after droughts. Affects plant survival and agriculture.23
5.	Soil Microbiome Changes	Disrupts nutrient cycling.20 Alters nutrient availability for plants.22
6.	Phenological Shifts	Early flowering disrupts pollinator synchrony. Impacts ecological interactions.12
7.	Invasive Species Expansion	Outcompetes endemic species. Threatens biodiversity.
8.	Pollinator-Plant Interaction Changes	Disrupted flowering and pollination synchrony. Reduces pollination rate.29
9.	Agricultural Adaptations	Techniques like cowl cropping enhance resilience. Maintain soil nutrient profile under climate change.31

Exploring the Impacts of Climate Change

As scientists and policymakers focus on the larger impacts of climate change, such as hotter temperatures, erratic changes in precipitation patterns, and more frequent extreme weather conditions across the globe, research to protect natural systems and help agriculture adaptation must also examine how these trends affect plant life. This detail, with geographic disruption and range shifting of various species as a consequence of climate change, has important implications for our action in response. The climate is an important factor influencing the geographical distribution of plant species, as the suitable zones for many species are shrinking, expanding, or changing in latitudinal and altitudinal extension as the earth’s climate changes.⁴

Plant Thermosensing

As global warming increases, research on plant thermosensing has also increased.⁵ Plants, as sessile organisms, have advanced strategies to adapt to these difficult environmental conditions. The activation of signaling pathways involving exceptional regulatory additives, consisting of sugars, phytohormones, calcium-based protein kinases, and mitogen-activated protein kinases, is one of the critical capabilities of a plant’s response to heat pressure.⁶ Plants adopt all these modification as a response to heat stress (Figure 2).

The expression of genes concerned with heat tolerance, including those encoding transcription factors, osmoprotectants, ion transporters, and antioxidant proteins, is brought about by these signaling cascades. Excessive temperatures have the potential to intrude with fundamental physiological functions in plants, together with photosynthesis, breathing, and water metabolism.⁵ Plant life has developed many processes to cope with those barriers, such as the synthesis of suitable solutes to preserve osmotic stability and mobile structure and the alteration in their antioxidant structures to repair redox homeostasis.^5–7

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Resilience

As global change accelerates, particularly climate change, it is important to establish a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between plant biodiversity and the resilience of ecosystems.⁸ Human-induced changes such as land conversion, pollution, invasive species, and disturbance activities such as fire exclusion will cause rapid transformations in ecosystems9 (Figure 3). These novelties threaten the stability of natural systems along with the ability of natural goods and services to be sustainable.¹⁰

One important dimension of this challenge is how plant diversity relates to the resilience of ecosystems. The declination and the alteration in richness, abundance, composition, and distribution of the biological diversity that occurs at wider scales affecting all levels of life on earth constitute the so-called biodiversity crisis.¹¹ This lack of biodiversity is mainly concerning as it compromises the capacity of ecosystems to withstand and get over the stresses and disturbances associated with climate change.

Phenological Shifts in Plant Life Cycles

Current research on phenological shifts in the life cycle of plants because of climate shifts has located adjustments in the timing and length of key life events. Studies have tested that flowering phenology in a lot of plant agencies has ended early, about 20 days, aligning with increasing temperatures. Plant species normally shift their entire flowering period earlier and prolong it. This early flowering has delivered approximately a reorganization of the flowering order internally and created new co-flowering assemblages of species. The effects of those phenological shifts are profound. Changes in flowering time can disrupt the synchrony among flora and their pollinators, resulting in decreased pollination success and decreased seed manufacturing. Furthermore, those shifts may have positive effects on network structures and ecological interactions among plant and animal species. Precise plant species may moreover respond to weather alternates in varying strategies that would alter competitive or facilitative interactions mediated by pollinators inside a network.¹²

The outcomes of phenological shifts make bigger precise species to environment-level strategies. Adjustments in the timing of leaf emergence and senescence can affect surroundings’ productiveness, water use performance, and carbon cycling. Early-blooming species, alongside grasses and early-growing shrubs, have been determined to expose larger phenological shifts in response to global warming to late-blooming species like bushes. Moreover, modifications in seasonal water use overall performance have been observed, with increasing spring performance and lowering autumn efficiency associated with early spring phenology and delayed autumn phenology.¹³ The complexity of these responses highlights the need for continued research to have proper information and anticipate the long-term consequences of phenological shifts on plant groups, ecosystems, and worldwide climate structures.^12–14

Drought Stress and Plant Productivity

Massive regions of the world are expected to appear more often and be affected by drought as weather change advances.^15,16 This represents a chief hazard to crop manufacturing and food security, as drought is one of the critical elements in agriculture that limits plant morphology and productivity.² In reality, throughout droughts, the amount of water available to plant roots can become so scarce that it can be risky for plants as their physiological functioning fails and productiveness diminishes.^2,17,18

Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Plant Growth

Some plants may increase growth and productivity as a result of the enhanced carbon uptake from the additional amount of CO2; therefore, they can more effectively use the extra carbon for photosynthesis. Nonetheless, the effects of CO2 fertilization could be neutralized by other abiotic stress factors related to climate change, including drought, heat, and salinity.³ To adequately meet the existing challenges of global warming, a molecular hand-feeding on plant biology, ecology, agronomy, and climate science is required. During global warming, we may also get one step toward a sustainable future with the aid of reading environmental crosstalk and arising with progressive strategies to strengthen plants’ herbal defenses.

Soil Microbiome and Plant Nutrition

The sustainable equilibrium of the soil microbiome is one of the most important factors that contribute to healthy and productive agricultural ecosystems.19 Research on how climate change is expected to have an effect on this surrounding needs to retain the complexity of this system and worldwide global warming.^19–21 It is made up of a large number of bacteria, fungi, and archaea, each contributing to different nutrient cycling lines.²¹ Useful microbes within the rhizosphere, the zone surrounding plant roots, can uplift the absorbance of important nutrients by vegetation, thus helping them grow and develop their structure. Mycorrhizal fungi, for example, develop mutualistic relationships with plant roots, offering an increased uptake of water and nutrients.²² Moreover, bacteria and archaea surrounding the plant roots can replenish atmospheric nitrogen, providing it for plant use, or solubilize phosphorus present in the soil, from where plants can easily approach and absorb it.²⁰

The changes in environmental situations driven by means of global warming have the potential to adversely disrupt the delicate balance of the soil microbiome.^20,21 For example, positive microbial species that can be better adapted to higher temperatures and drier conditions may become populated in an area where the weather warms, while different, much less resilient species might also decline in abundance.²⁰ This shift inside the microbial network composition will result in adjustments in the availability of vital vitamins, ultimately affecting plant growth and productiveness.²² The project involves growing strategies to preserve a healthy and resilient soil microbiome in the face of these environmental modifications. One method is to address the proper maintenance of soil reserves, which serve as a crucial food supply for the numerous microorganisms residing in the soil. By means of implementing sustainable agricultural practices, including decreased tillage, cowl cropping, and the utility of organic amendments, the soil’s potential to assist a various and purposeful microbiome can be amplified.^20,22

Extreme Weather Events and Plant Survival

The increasing frequency and depth of excessively harsh climates have been extremely detrimental to plant life, which pose huge challenges for plant survival and, therefore, to global agriculture manufacturing. Such occurrences are built up of extreme drought, followed by excessive rainfall and waterlogging that may have a devastating impact on the growth and development of plants, which may additionally, in the end, affect crop yields and potentially create food shortages.²³ For example, increased tolerance to waterlogging and post-waterlogging recovery was observed in drought-tolerant coffee plants; therefore, the results point out the possibility of developing crop varieties with more resilience to both dry (drought) and wet (waterlogged) conditions via findings obtained for one stress being applied in other abiotic stress conditions.²⁴ Meanwhile, some research has also been done on employing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a sustainable strategy for adapting agricultural systems.²⁰

Invasive Species and Native Ecosystems

Invasive species are organisms that are not local to a particular environment and are considered the second major challenge to international biodiversity after habitat loss.²⁵ The effects of global warming on plant ecosystems are diverse compared to their impact on individual species. They intertwine with the unfolding of invasive species to create a complicated web of ecological disruption. As temperatures increase, many invasive flowers discover new congenial areas, allowing them to increase the size of their ranges and establish themselves in previously inappropriate habitats. This climate-driven expansion of invasive species poses a growing danger to local ecosystems, as those beginners often outcompete nearby flowers, changing network composition and environmental capabilities.^26,27 By outcompeting local species, changing crucial ecosystem procedures, and even causing the extinction of inclined local vegetation and fauna, those nonlocal organisms have the capacity to seriously disrupt sensitive ecological balances.

Pollinator-Plant Interactions in Flux

Climate warming is inflicting temporal mismatches between plants and pollinators, with growing empirical proof of phenological shifts.²⁸ Studies display that warming advances network-level flowering onset and height but might not alter bee emergence timing to the same degree. Warmed plant communities produce fewer and smaller flora with much less nectar. Consistency of nectar becomes more condensed due to warming situations. Warmed bees tend to be more generalized in their foraging. Plant-bee interactions become much less frequent, shorter in length, and peak in advance underneath warming.²⁹ This could lead to reduced co-occurrence of interacting partners in shared habitats. Spatial mismatches also occur because the geographic overlap among flora and pollinators may also decrease or increase depending on species development and adaptability.²⁸

Agricultural Impacts and Food Security

Climate change is having considerable influences on agricultural manufacturing and meal protection worldwide. The research shows that as temperature increases and precipitation styles change, the overall crop yields are affected, with decreased productivity in a few areas.³⁰ Beyond the effects on crop yields, global warming is changing the nutritional value of meals. Increased atmospheric CO2 ranges are projected to decrease the nutritional content of plants, along with decreased protein, zinc, and iron in staple grains. This will exacerbate existing nutrient deficiencies, especially in developing countries. It is also affecting the worldwide distribution of fisheries, jeopardizing the ability to reach wild-caught fish that many populations depend upon for key nutrients. Prevention of food is another growing subject, as changing environmental conditions may additionally lead to emerging pathogens and multiplied contamination hazards. For instance, aflatoxin contamination in maize accelerated as the surroundings became hotter and drier. Rising temperatures are also related to the extra prevalence of foodborne health damages. The effects of global warming on food systems increase beyond manufacturing to other elements of the supply chain. Intense climate occasions threaten food transport, garages, and processing infrastructure. Thermal pressure is projected to reduce exertion productiveness in agriculture, potentially decreasing crop yield and, ultimately, hike price.³¹

Adaptation Strategies for Vegetation

Plant species have established many adaptive mechanisms in response to international warming. One important mechanism is that species migrate to better latitudes or altitudes, looking for higher weather situations.^32,33 Because of this alteration in distributional range, plants can emerge from their native environments as temperatures rise. However, the ability to migrate is restricted via elements like habitat fragmentation and the rate of climate change exceeding the rate at which flowers can migrate.³³ Physiological modifications are another massive version of the method. While exposed to better temperatures, some flora, especially those aware of cooler areas, show greater photosynthetic capability and effective improvement. However, species’ acclimatization capability varies, with the ones from warmer, lower-latitude locations regularly displaying decreased carbon uptake and growth with increasing temperature.³²

Adjustments in phenology, together with earlier flowering and leaf-out instances, are also found as flora adapts to warmer situations. This permits them to take benefit of longer growing seasons. Moreover, a few species may alter their reproductive strategies, together with adjustments in seed manufacturing and dispersal styles.³³ mechanisms. As climate exchange frequently results in altered precipitation patterns and elevated drought stress, vegetation can develop deeper root structures or adjust its stomatal control to conserve water. Some species may additionally shift their aid allocation, prioritizing survival over boom during durations of strain.³² The genetic model through herbal choice is another long-term strategy. Plants that better withstand hotter and doubtlessly drier conditions are much more likely to live to tell the tale and reproduce, progressively shifting the genetic makeup of populations.³³

Novel Directions and Policy Implications

To lessen the effects of global warming on flora, progressive studies and experiments should be cognizant of growing climate-resilient plant genotypes by efficient breeding techniques, such as CRISPR gene modification and traditional hybridization. Those approaches can improve tendencies consisting of drought tolerance, thermoresistance, and nutrient efficiency. Additionally, multi-omics frameworks must be utilized to discover the complex interactions between flowers and their microbiomes underneath changing environmental situations, facilitating the identification of useful microbial interactions that can enhance plant health and productiveness. Key concerns should include field tests in susceptible places, such as arid zones and places undergoing fast ecological exchange, which will compare how properly those variations work in practical conditions. Actionable guidelines for policymakers consist of encouraging sustainable farming techniques like cover plants, decreased tillage, and organic amendments that improve soil fitness and biodiversity. To make sure that farmers are organized to deal with climate-associated problems, monetary incentives are probably offered to the locals who use those techniques. Policies should additionally encourage research grants for sustainable farming practices and conservation initiatives that shield local ecosystems from invasive species. To create complete rules that deal with the quick and long-term consequences of global warming on plant ecosystems, scientists, agricultural stakeholders, and politicians ought to collaborate.

Conclusion

A comprehensive, cross-functional approach is required to present a multifaceted challenge occurring due to complex synergies between global warming and plant fluctuations. This review has conducted a multidimensional analysis of the systematic relationship that highlights the changes in plant physiology due to the increasing temperature and the alteration in taxonomic diversity and ecosystem sustainability in response to global warming. The seasonal variation analyzed in the life cycles of plants, together with the rising trends of severe weather occasions, illustrate the urgency of investigating the influence of changing diversity in climate on plants. Systematic effects of global warming on plant life include disturbance in plant nutrition due to the increased soil microbial community, the disruption caused to native community structure by the non-native species, and interruption of pollinator-plant relationship. With such ongoing challenges, it is difficult to design and optimize the dynamic techniques that let the plant deal with the changes occurring in the environment as a result of global warming. The impact of changing environmental conditions on plant life, the natural ecosystem, and the human community can be lessened by converting the leading-edge investigation into a workable policy solution and, on the parallel end, by spreading the awareness among the public about the connection between climate change and plants. To ensure a resilient future for our plant in the face of global warming, strategic directions like sustained scientific investigations, creative and sustainable land management practices, and coordinated efforts to increase the resistance of both natural and agricultural systems are required.

References

1 Scarlett L. Climate change effects: The intersection of science, policy, and resource management in the USA. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2010;29(3):892-903. doi:10.1899/09-135.1.
https://doi.org/10.1899/09-135.1
 
2 Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress: Plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01147.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
 
3 Roychowdhury R, Das SP, Gupta A, Parihar P, ChandraSekhar K, Sarkar U, et al. Multi-omics pipeline and omics-integration approach to decipher plant’s abiotic stress tolerance responses. Genes (Basel). 2023;14(6):1281. doi:10.3390/genes14061281.
https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061281
 
4 Gómez-Ruiz EP, Lacher TE. Climate change, range shifts, and the disruption of a pollinator-plant complex. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14048. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50059-6.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50059-6
 
5 Zhao J, Lu Z, Wang L, Jin B. Plant responses to heat stress: Physiology, transcription, noncoding RNAs, and epigenetics. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1):117. doi:10.3390/ijms22010117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010117
 
6 Fu Y, Yang L, Gao H, Wenji X, Li Q, Li H, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals heat stress-responsive genes and their signalling pathways in lilies (Lilium longiflorum vs. Lilium distichum). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239605. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239605.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239605
 
7 Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam Md, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(5):9643-84. doi:10.3390/ijms14059643.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14059643
 
8 Borrell JS, Dodsworth S, Forest F, Pérez-Escobar OA, Lee MA, Mattana E, et al. The climatic challenge: Which plants will people use in the next century? Environ Exp Bot. 2020;170:103872. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103872.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103872
 
9 Chambers JC, Allen CR, Cushman SA. Operationalizing ecological resilience concepts for managing species and ecosystems at risk. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7. doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00241.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00241
 
10 Smale DA, Wernberg T, Oliver ECJ, et al. Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(4):306-12. doi:10.1038/s41558-019- 0412-1.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1
 
11 Fajardo P, Beauchesne D, Carbajal-López A, Daigle RM, Fierro-Arcos DL, Goldsmit J, et al. Aichi Target 18 beyond 2020: Mainstreaming Traditional Biodiversity Knowledge in the conservation and sustainable use of marine and coastal ecosystems. PeerJ. 2021;9:e9616. doi:10.7717/peerj.9616.
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9616
 
12 Pareja-Bonilla D, Arista M, Morellato LPC, Ortiz PL. Better soon than never: Climate change induces strong phenological reassembly in the flowering of a Mediterranean shrub community. Ann Bot. Published online December 14, 2023. doi:10.1093/aob/mcad193.
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad193
 
13 Fu YH, Prevéy JS, Vitasse Y. Editorial: Plant phenology shifts and their ecological and climatic consequences. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1071266.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1071266
 
14 Park JS, Post E. Seasonal timing on a cyclical Earth: Towards a theoretical framework for the evolution of phenology. PLoS Biol. 2022;20(12):e3001952. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001952.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001952
 
15 Gustafson EJ, Miranda BR, Sturtevant BR. Can future CO2 concentrations mitigate the negative effects of high temperature and longer droughts on forest growth? Forests. 2018;9(11):664. doi:10.3390/f9110664.
https://doi.org/10.3390/f9110664
 
16 Lamaoui M, Jemo M, Datla R, Bekkaoui F. Heat and drought stresses in crops and approaches for their mitigation. Front Chem. 2018;6. doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00026.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00026
 
17 Camaille M, Fabre N, Clément C, Ait Barka E. Advances in wheat physiology in response to drought and the role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria to trigger drought tolerance. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):687. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9040687.
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9040687
 
18 Abid M, Ali S, Qi LK, Zahoor R, Tian Z, Jiang D, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4615. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21441-7
 
19 Marco S, Loredana M, Riccardo V, Raffaella B, Walter C, Luca N. Microbe-assisted crop improvement: A sustainable weapon to restore holobiont functionality and resilience. Hortic Res. 2022;9. doi:10.1093/hr/uhac160.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac160
 
20 Shah A, Nazari M, Antar M, Msimbira LA, Naamala J, Lyu D, et al. PGPR in agriculture: A sustainable approach to increasing climate change resilience. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.667546.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.667546
 
21 Odelade K, Babalola O. Bacteria, fungi and archaea domains in rhizospheric soil and their effects in enhancing agricultural productivity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(20):3873. doi:10.3390/ijerph16203873.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203873
 
22 Pagano M, Correa E, Duarte N, Yelikbayev B, O’Donovan A, Gupta V. Advances in eco- efficient agriculture: The plant-soil mycobiome. Agriculture. 2017;7(2):14. doi:10.3390/agriculture7020014.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7020014
 
23 Heino M, Kinnunen P, Anderson W, Ray DK, Puma MJ, Varis O, et al. Increased probability of hot and dry weather extremes during the growing season threatens global crop yields. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3583. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29378-2.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29378-2
 
24 Toral-Juárez MA, Avila RT, Cardoso AA, Brito FAL, Machado KLG, Almeida WL, et al. Drought-tolerant coffee plants display increased tolerance to waterlogging and post-waterlogging reoxygenation. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;182:104311. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104311
 
25 James J, Slater FM, Vaughan IP, Young KA, Cable J. Comparing the ecological impacts of native and invasive crayfish: Could native species’ translocation do more harm than good? Oecologia. 2015;178(1):309-16. doi:10.1007/s00442-014-3195-0.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3195-0
 
26 Sangiorgio D, Cellini A, Donati I, Pastore C, Onofrietti C, Spinelli F. Facing climate change: Application of microbial biostimulants to mitigate stress in horticultural crops. Agronomy. 2020;10(6):794. doi:10.3390/agronomy10060794.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060794
 
27 Patón D, García-Gómez JC, Loring J, Torres A. Composting the invasive toxic seaweed Rugulopteryx okamurae using five invertebrate species, and a mini-review on composting macroalgae. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2023;14(1):167-84. doi:10.1007/s12649-022-01849-z.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01849-z
 
28 Gérard M, Vanderplanck M, Wood T, Michez D. Global warming and plant-pollinator mismatches. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020;4(1):77-86. doi:10.1042/ETLS20190139.
https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190139
 
29 de Manincor N, Fisogni A, Rafferty NE. Warming of experimental plant-pollinator communities advances phenologies, alters traits, reduces interactions and depresses reproduction. Ecol Lett. 2023;26(2):323-34. doi:10.1111/ele.14158.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14158
 
30 Dasgupta S, Robinson EJZ. Attributing changes in food insecurity to a changing climate. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4709. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08696-x.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08696-x
 
31 Myers S, Fanzo J, Wiebe K, Huybers P, Smith M. Current guidance underestimates risk of global environmental change to food security. BMJ. Published online September 29, 2022:e071533. doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-071533.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071533
 
32 Crous KY. Plant responses to climate warming: Physiological adjustments and implications for plant functioning in a future, warmer world. Am J Bot. 2019;106(8):1049-51. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1329.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1329
 
33 Feeley KJ, Freeman BG. Global warming: Plants and animals on the move. Front Young Minds. 2023;11. doi:10.3389/frym.2023.999231.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frym.2023.999231

Cite this article as:
Sameen S, Shah KH, Khalil I, Bilal Khalil M. Global Warming and Plant Fluctuation: Untangling Complex Environmental Interactions. Premier Journal of Plant Biology 2025;2:100009

Export to EndNote Export to Mendeley