Saira Sameen 
Department of Life Sciences, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
Correspondence to: sairasameen294@gmail.com
Additional information
- Ethical approval: N/a
- Consent: N/a
- Funding: No industry funding
- Conflicts of interest: N/a
- Author contribution: Saira Sameen – Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, review and editing
- Guarantor: Saira Sameen
- Provenance and peer-review:
Commissioned and externally peer-reviewed - Data availability statement: N/a
Keywords: Plant stress tolerance, Genetic engineering, Abiotic stressors, Molecular mechanisms, Sustainable agriculture.
Peer Review
Received: 28 October 2024
Revised: 15 January 2025
Accepted: 16 January 2025
Published: 29 January 2025
Abstract
Understanding plant resilience and how plants cope with environmental challenges such as climate change and air pollutants is an important focus in biology. The current study creates a potential complexity of regulatory pathways under abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, flooding (hypoxia), heat stress, and heavy metal toxicity in plants. To allow plants to survive under these stresses, integrated physiological, biochemical, and molecular strategies were permuted by controlling water transport systems together with the production of antioxidants and genetic adaptation. For example, plants may close stomata to reduce water vapor during droughts and stimulate root development for improved water absorption.
For instance, it leads to metabolic changes necessary for living in an oxygen-deprived environment like flooding. In addition, some recently developed biotechnology approaches as strategies for the amelioration of plant tolerance via genetic modification and rhizosphere microorganism supplementation are also examined. Due to the complex interplay of stress responses and adaptation mechanisms, understanding these relationships is crucial for designing sustainable agriculture practices. A new understanding of mechanisms dealing with plants’ resistance towards biotic and abiotic stresses can be built by these kinds of interdisciplinary approaches which lightens the need for more research so that plant productivity can be improved under stressed environmental circumstances. Eventually, food preservation and overall ecosystem balance can be achieved by implementing the research results in common agricultural and farming practices.
Introduction
Global warming and environmental pollutants cause a worldwide threat to plant survival and growth, necessitating the adaptation of advanced mechanisms which help plants respond and adapt to such stressors.1 In addition to abiotic environmental stressors like drought, severe temperatures, and pollution, pathogenic microorganisms pose a constant threat to plants.2 Plants have evolved intricate regulatory pathways that permit them to react and adapt to diverse environmentally imposed demanding situations, together with drought, salinity, and sickness.3,4 Through an advanced network of molecular mechanisms, flora are capable of preserving appropriate hormone homeostasis, mitigating and improving their standard strain tolerance, ultimately supporting their productivity and survival under destructive conditions.3,5,6
Studies have proven that crops have established a range of physiological, biochemical, and molecular strategies to address pressure. For example, as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under pressure can result in oxidative harm, flora have evolved antioxidant mechanisms to mitigate this impact. This interaction between pressure and adaptation underscores a hermetic response, in which low levels of strain can stimulate adaptive processes that enhance resilience. As a result, the capacity of flora to navigate these complex interactions no longer fortifies their immediate responses to environmentally generated demanding situations. However, it increases their long-term survival and productiveness in fluctuating conditions.7,8 Innovative processes in biotechnology are being explored to enhance plant tolerance to environmental stresses. Genetic engineering has played a critical role in growing stress-tolerant crop varieties by introducing or overexpressing strain-responsive genes. Those improvements aim to enhance mechanisms associated with osmo-protection, ion transport, and oxidative protection structures.9
Furthermore, studies have recognized the potential of using useful microorganisms and biochar programs to improve plant resilience towards heavy metal toxicity and drought situations.9,10 The model strategies located in plant life consist of changes in morphological trends, along with root structure and leaf structure, which enhance water uptake and reduce transpiration during drought. Studies have documented how precise genes modify these adaptive trends, contributing to emerging biomass manufacturing and overall plant responses under stress.10,11 Furthermore, the consequences of multiple research studies demonstrate the multidisciplinary technique in figuring out how vegetation responds to disturbing climatic conditions, which is essential for growing climate-change-resilient agricultural methods.7,8,10
Methodology
This review summarizes the understanding of how plant life responds to numerous environmental stressors, such as drought, flooding, excessive and sporadic temperatures, salt, soil pH, heavy metals, and overabundance or scarcity of nutrients. An in-depth examination of peer-reviewed papers and studies posted in reputable scientific journals is a part of the approach. Critical databases, including Google Scholar and PubMed, were used to gather applicable data. The criteria included research centered on the physiological, biochemical, and molecular diversifications of flora under distinctive pressure situations. The evaluation targeted how useful microbes, phytohormones, and genetic engineering can improve plant resilience. The review also highlights the value of a multidisciplinary approach in understanding how plants respond to harsh environmental situations, that is important for growing sustainable farming practices in response to climate change. Prepared and synthesized records are used to give a precise overview of plant stress responses and resilience mechanisms.
Plant Responses to Drought
Drought is a main environmental strain that poses an adverse threat to plant survival and crop productivity worldwide. Because of the static nature of vegetation, it is fairly prone to the impacts of hydrological stress, which can be distributed from mild water deficits to intense water loss.12 In reaction to drought, plants adapt various physiological and metabolic mechanisms to defend themselves against the harm generated by stress. One of the key techniques adopted by the plants to fight drought is the law of water regulation and utilization. Flora have advanced hydraulic machinery, consisting of the soil-plant-environment continuum, to correctly manage water resources.13 In water deficit situations, plants can provoke various diversifications, like stomatal closure and architectural modifications, to reduce water loss and modulate water uptake.12 Drought pressure additionally triggers a reprogramming of plant transcriptional, proteomic, and metabolic pathways to defend cells from harm. This metabolic reaction involves the manufacturing of well-matched solutes, antioxidants, and different protecting compounds that assist membrane stability and scavenge ROSs.3 All these responses generated by the plant work in coordination and help the plant survive the drought period (Figure 1). Moreover, flora have evolved complicated genetic and molecular mechanisms to enhance their resilience and adaptableness to drought. Silencing of precise genes, including OsGRXS17 in rice, has been proven to enhance drought pressure tolerance with the help of modulating ROS accumulation and signaling pathways.14
Plant Responses to Flooding
Another environmental stressor that vegetation faces is flooding. Waterlogging conditions can result in oxygen deprivation and hypoxia, which may seriously affect plant growth and productivity. In response to flooding, flora go through a sequence of physiological and metabolic adjustments to address the dearth of oxygen. The physiological responses to flooding are characterized by means of fast depletion of soil oxygen, leading to altered metabolic processes that inhibit growth. Early signs and symptoms of stress consist of stomatal closure, decreased photosynthesis, and changes in carbohydrate translocation and mineral absorption. These responses vary widely amongst distinctive plant species and are often related to specific morphological diversifications.15,16 Additionally, because it allows the synthesis of carbohydrates and the formation of molecular oxygen which can diffuse to oxygen-deficient regions, underwater photosynthesis is crucial to the survival of submerged plants. The aggregation of poisonous substances in flooded soils poses another huge challenge for vegetation. Some species broaden an apoplastic suberin barrier in their roots, which serves to protect against access to pollutants while minimizing oxygen loss. This adaptation is important in imparting the growing frequency of flooding activities predicted through climate change frequencies, which threaten agricultural productiveness globally.15
Plant Responses to High Temperature
Numerous researches have highlighted the profound effect of excessive temperatures on plant morphology and development. Expanded temperatures can improve phenology, aiming to reduce biomass production and shorter reproductive ranges, which bring about tremendous loss in crop yield. Furthermore, expanded temperature strain can disrupt structure, morphology, and gene expression, affecting diverse components of plant structure and characteristics (Figure 2).17 Research suggests that plant life adapts various physiological and biochemical mechanisms to address warmth pressure. For instance, the synthesis of heat shock proteins (HSPs) plays an important role in defensive cellular features during thermal stress, supporting stable proteins and membranes.18,19
Moreover, the application of plant-growth-promoting microorganisms has been explored as one of the methods to improve stress tolerance in plants like wheat, improving their biochemical responses to pressure.19 Moreover, environmental factors consisting of expanded atmospheric CO2 degrees can influence plant responses to high temperatures. Research has shown that multiplied CO2 can improve photosynthesis rate and enhance water use efficiency and basic plant health during combined strain situations like drought and excessive temperatures.20,21
Plant Response to Low Temperature
Plant responses to low temperatures emphasize the significance of vernalization and the function of epigenetic mechanisms in improving resilience. Vegetation shows responses to chilling (0–15 °C) and freezing (<0 °C) stresses, with cryoacclimation being important for developing freezing tolerance. This process includes preceding exposure to sublethal hypothermic situations, leading to modifications in cells together with improved membrane pressure and the manufacturing of quick temperature-responsive proteins, including antifreeze proteins. Epigenetic adjustments, which encompass DNA methylation and histone adjustments, are pivotal in regulating gene expression associated with cryoacclimation. Furthermore, the ICE-CBF-COR signaling pathway is relevant to low-temperature tolerance mechanisms, in which C-repeat binding factors (CBFs) act as transcriptional activators for cold-responsive genes. Genetic engineering strategies are being explored to improve low-temperature tolerance in vegetation by manipulating these pathways and proteins, aiming to extend techniques that may resist hypothermic conditions efficiently. The combination of such findings into agricultural practices ought to substantially improves crop resilience in response to hypothermia.22
Plant Responses to Salinity
Plants perceive salt pressure by precise sensory mechanisms, which trigger a cascade of signaling pathways essential for osmotic adjustment and ionic homeostasis. Key additives encompass the synthesis of osmolytes which consist of proline and glycine betaine, which assist in maintaining cell turgor and keep the plant from dehydration under excessive salinity conditions. The paper moreover discusses the essential roles of phytohormones and light indicators in coordinating those responses, underscoring the complexity of plant variation strategies in saline environments.23 Salinity disrupts physiological techniques, including photosynthesis and ion stability. The paper notes that salt stress leads to oxidative harm, requiring plants to enhance their antioxidant defenses. It identifies numerous purposeful genes that play a role in salt tolerance, including the ones liable for the transportation of ion and stress-responsive proteins. It additionally highlights the importance of retaining the potassium-to-sodium ratio inside plant cells as an essential mechanism for mitigating the detrimental consequences of salinity.24,25
Plant Responses to Soil pH
Soil pH is an important factor that affects the size, structure, and growth of plants. It additionally affects the availability of essential nutrients, the activity of soil microbes, and the solubility of environmental pollutants. Analyzing the relationship between soil pH and plant responses is vital for land management and plant subculture. The function of soil pH in nutrient biking and plant nutrients is among its crucial features. Acidic soils can improve the supply of dangerous nutrients like iron, zinc, and aluminum while reducing the availability of vital nutrients like potassium, calcium, and magnesium (Figure 3).26 However, plant deficits in iron, manganese, zinc, and boron can result from alkaline soils. Most vegetation thrives within the pH range of 6.0–7.0, which maximizes the availability of most vitamins.27
Such fluctuation in the absorption of vital nutrients with the changing pH ranges of soil disrupts other metabolic and physiological processes in the plant. Soil pH also affects the efficiency of soil microbes, which play an essential function in nutrient supply and breakdown of organic substances. Whilst alkaline soils can improve the growth of microbes that flourish there, acidic soils may restrict the development and function of some beneficial bacteria. Plants have developed different strategies to adapt to the fluctuating pH of soil. Many plant species show optimum growth only in a restricted pH range, while others can bear a high degree of altering soil pH. Studies show different techniques that govern how flora respond to increased proton (H+) and aluminum concentrations in acidic soils.28 Even though studies on how plant life reacts to low pH have improved our understanding, many essential pathways are nevertheless unknown and need to be better understood.26–29
Plant Responses to Heavy Metals
Heavy metals when present in an excessive amount can cause stress by interfering with enzyme activity or genetic fabric. But crops have evolved systems to live on or even thrive in heavy-metal-rich environments. Metal hyperaccumulation is a variation mechanism with some plants that may collect heavy metals in their tissues at appreciably higher portions than regular without turning toxic. These metallophytes have advanced mechanisms to either exclude or actively acquire heavy metals, letting them thrive in soils with naturally excessive concentrations, which includes serpentine soil.30 Plants have evolved a diffusion of biochemical signaling pathways and detoxifying systems to address heavy metal pressure. One essential edition is the formation of chelating substances including metallothioneins, phytochelatins, and natural acids, that may bind to heavy metals and sequester them within the vacuole or cellular wall, preventing them from interfering with cell capabilities.31 Transporters that could effectively switch heavy metals into and out of the cytoplasm also are required to maintain homeostasis.32
In addition to such direct cleansing strategies, plants can undergo morphological adjustments that limit heavy metal uptake. For instance, roots may additionally thicken and release chemical compounds that bind to metals or desire lateral root length increase to explore a larger soil extent while concurrently protecting deeper penetration into polluted strata. Interestingly, several researchers have determined that applying exogenous vitamins such as nitrogen and phosphorus will have a synergistic impact, growing the plant’s ability to face up to and remediate metal intoxication.33
Plant Responses to the Nutrient Deficiency and Nutrient Excess
Nutrient availability, whether in deficient or surplus form, is an essential aspect that can have a significant impact on plant performance.6,34 Crops are adaptable to nutrient deficits and toxicities by modifying their biochemical pathways and morphological features. These diversifications include changes in root structure, extended nutrient uptake performance, and metabolic reprogramming. All these adaptations provide a basis for plants to show better growth and development under pressure.35 Moreover, vegetation has advanced complex regulatory networks that enable it to understand and transmit signals in reaction to nutrient-associated stressors, triggering the proper defenses. Abscisic acid, a phytohormone, is important for coordinating these adaptive responses as well as controlling hormone stability, gene expression, and different physiological functions. For example, abscisic acid (ABA)-based drought strain responses are regulated by activating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways, inclusive of the CaAIMK1 MAPK in pepper.36
Significant biomolecule synthesis, including proteins and chlorophyll, crucial for photosynthesis and overall plant health, can be substantially impacted by nutrient deficiency stress. In response, flora cause protection mechanisms that reduce the effect of nutritional imbalances, including the activation of signaling pathways such as the ABA and SOS pathways. These mechanisms permit microorganisms to efficiently adapt to excesses and deficits using physiological strategies such as osmotic balance and stomatal closure.35,37 Furthermore, phosphorus (P) is important in deciding the plant’s responses to abiotic stressors. According to the investigation, plants that obtain sufficient P nutrients grow more efficiently and display greater resilience to environmentally demanding situations like salinity and drought. Through precise signaling pathways, vegetation modifies its phosphorus metabolism, modifying stomatal behavior and root architecture to increase resistance to environmental stresses.38 Oxidative stress and disturbed nutrient balances are highlighted as damaging effects of increased phosphorus, explaining the significance of proper nutrient management in agricultural techniques.38,39 Developing sturdy crop genotypes that may flourish in harsh environmental conditions is an adaptive strategy to respond to the harmful effects caused by nutrient excess and deficiency. Farmers can more effectively deal with nutrient stress by adapting green nutrient management techniques in agriculture and by implementing advanced molecular biology equipment to develop a better understanding of plant adaptation mechanisms.
Plant Responses to Pathogen
Using both constitutive and inducible defenses, plants have developed complex systems to recognize and react to pathogen attacks. Complex signaling cascades are triggered in plants in response to pathogen stress, which results in the synthesis of defensive chemicals, structural reinforcements, and the development of systematic acquired resistance. Plants can adjust to shifting pathogen pressures and remain resilient in biotic stress because of this multilayered defense mechanism. With effector-triggered immunity identifying particular pathogen effectors and pattern recognition receptors identifying conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns, the plant immune system is essential to this process. The activation of defense responses and transcriptional reprogramming are the final results of these recognition events, which also start downstream signaling pathways such as calcium signaling and mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades.
Key mediators in coordinating such protection responses are the phytohormones ethylene, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid, and their relative balance adjusts the plant’s response to certain infections. Furthermore, plants have developed protection-priming structures that allow a quicker and more effective response to a subsequent pathogen. Plants with this adaptive capability are more resilient and are capable of bearing and reproducing in an environment with exceptional ranges of disease stress. The importance of epigenetic adjustments in plant protective responses has also been brought to attention by current research, which has shown that DNA methylation and histone modifications contribute to each transgenerational inheritance of improved resistance against pathogens and short-term adaptability.40
However, successful pathogen evasion or suppression of those defenses can still cause an ailment. Past biotic stressors and abiotic environmental factors can also compromise a plant’s resistance or tolerance to precise pathogens, necessitating the usage of antimicrobial chemical compounds for ailment control. Due to public scrutiny over the environmental dangers of insecticides, creative methods for disease control are getting increasingly vital, such as harnessing the plant’s own immune system to trigger prompt resistance.2 Table 1 lists the primary physiological methods, genetic engineering techniques, and efficacy of different plant variation techniques to many environmental stresses, such as heavy metals, drought, flooding, thermo-sensing, salinity, soil pH, and nutrient excesses or deficiencies.
| Table 1: Systematic comparison of plant adaptation strategies to environmental stressors. | ||||
| Sr. No. | Stress Type | Physiological Mechanisms | Genetic Engineering/Microbial Assistance | Effectiveness |
| 1. | Drought | Stomatal closure, root modifications, compatible solute production.12 | Overexpression of drought-responsive genes (e.g., OsGRXS17)14 | High in reducing water loss and enhancing survival.14 |
| 2. | Flooding | Underwater photosynthesis, apoplastic suberin barrier formation.15 | Aerenchyma formation for oxygen transport.15 | Moderate, depending on species-specific traits.15,16 |
| 3. | High Temperature | Heat shock proteins synthesis.18,19 | Use of plant-growth-promoting microorganisms.19 | Moderate, with potential for yield loss despite protective mechanisms.17 |
| 4. | Low Temperature | Cryoacclimation, antifreeze protein production.22 | Manipulation of ICE-CBF-COR signaling pathways.22 | High in enhancing freezing tolerance.22 |
| 5. | Salinity | Osmolyte synthesis, ion homeostasis maintenance.23 | Introduction of salt-tolerant genes.24 | High in maintaining cellular integrity. |
| 6. | Soil pH | Nutrient uptake adjustments, root modifications.33 | Soil microbes aid in nutrient cycling.26 | Variable, depending on plant species and soil conditions. |
| 7. | Heavy Metal | Metallothionein synthesis, chelation.31 | Exogenous nutrients (N, P) enhance plant resistance.38 | High in hyperaccumulating plants.30 |
| 8. | Nutrient Deficiency/Excess | Hormonal regulation, root architecture changes.35,36 | Beneficial microorganisms enhance nutrient uptake. | Moderate, with potential for growth optimization.35 |
Novel Directions and Policy Implications
Employing advanced genomics and transcriptomics can help us become aware of novel pressure-responsive genes and regulatory pathways, which can be manipulated through CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to improve pressure tolerance. Moreover, theoretical frameworks such as systems biology can be implemented to obtain expected plant responses in complicated pressure situations, taking into consideration more accurate forecasting and control techniques. Increasing practical programs for those findings in agricultural practices, specifically in inclined regions, needs comprehensive strategies. Initially, breeding applications should recognize growing crop varieties that are resilient to more than one stressor, leveraging genetic engineering and marker-assisted techniques. Secondly, using beneficial microorganisms and biochar can be promoted to improve soil health and plant resilience in opposition to environmental stresses. Moreover, enforcing precision agriculture strategies, together with precision irrigation and nutrient control, can optimize minimizing environmental effects. In prone areas, community-based initiatives that educate farmers to produce stress-tolerant crop genotypes and sustainable practices may be vital in improving agricultural productivity and resilience. Subsequently, policy help for studies and improvement of pressure-tolerant vegetation together with subsidies for farmers adopting those practices can boost the interpretation of studies into sensible solutions.
Conclusion
Plant’s resistance and adjustability to environmentally imposed stressors are crucial for their adaptation and efficiency in a difficult climatic condition. Plants have developed sophisticated stability between biochemical, molecular, and physiological pathways to actively respond to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stressors which include high and low temperature, heavy metal stress, drought, salinity, pathogens, and flooding. These variations along with the enhancement of their immediate survival additionally contribute to long-term resilience against ongoing environmental modifications. Studies highlight the significance of genetic engineering and revolutionary agricultural practices in developing stress-tolerant crop genotypes. Using particular genes and employing useful microorganisms, we are able to substantially improve plant responses to destructive conditions. Furthermore, expertise in the complicated signaling pathways employed in plant stress responses is essential for growing sustainable agricultural systems that could face the pressures of climate change. The multidisciplinary method in reading plant responses emphasizes the need for collaboration across numerous fields to address the demanding situations of environmental stressors. As we hold on to discovering these adaptive mechanisms, it will become evident that improving plant resilience is not always just a clinical enterprise but an important step closer to ensuring food security and ecological balance in response to worldwide environmental changes.
References
1 Espeland EK, Kettenring KM. Strategic plant choices can alleviate climate change impacts: A review. J Environ Manage. 2018;222:316-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.042
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.042
2 Hamany Djande CY, Steenkamp PA, Piater LA, Tugizimana F, Dubery IA. Metabolic reprogramming of barley in response to foliar application of dichlorinated functional analogues of salicylic acid as priming agents and inducers of plant defence. Metabolites. 2023;13(5):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050666
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13050666
3 Ji J, Zeng Y, Zhang S, Chen F, Hou X, Li Q. The miR169b/NFYA1 module from the halophyte Halostachys caspica endows salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis through multi-pathways. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1026421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1026421
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1026421
4 Wilkinson SW, Magerøy MH, López Sánchez A, Smith LM, Furci L, Anne Cotton TE, et al. Surviving in a hostile world: Plant strategies to resist pests and diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2019;57(1):505-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-095959
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-095959
5 Wang H, Qin F. Genome-wide association study reveals natural variations contributing to drought resistance in crops. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01110
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01110
6 Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, Tran LSP. Response of plants to water stress. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:86. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00086
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00086
7 Mareri L, Parrotta L, Cai G. Environmental stress and plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(10):5416. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105416
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105416
8 Cáceres-Cevallos GJ, Jordán MJ. Effects of LED light on aromatic medicinal plants from Lavandula, Salvia, and Thymus Genera: A systematic review. Stresses. 2024;4(4):627-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040040
https://doi.org/10.3390/stresses4040040
9 Ahanger MA, Akram NA, Ashraf M, Alyemeni MN, Wijaya L, Ahmad P. Plant responses to environmental stresses-From gene to biotechnology. AoB Plants. 2017;9(4):plx025. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx025
https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plx025
10 Sytar O, Kumar A. Editorial: The adaptation strategies of plants to alleviate important environmental stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1307399. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1307399
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1307399
11 Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K. Plant environmental stress responses for survival and biomass enhancement. In Climate Change and Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance 2013;(pp. 79-108). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527675265.ch04
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527675265.ch04
12 Mitra J, Xu G, Wang B, Li M, Deng X. Understanding desiccation tolerance using the resurrection plant Boea hygrometrica as a model system. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00446
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00446
13 Sengupta D, Guha A, Reddy AR. Interdependence of plant water status with photosynthetic performance and root defense responses in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek under progressive drought stress and recovery. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2013;127:170-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.08.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.08.004
14 Hu Y, Wu Q, Peng Z, Sprague SA, Wang W, Park J, et al. Silencing of OsGRXS17 in rice improves drought stress tolerance by modulating ROS accumulation and stomatal closure. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16230-7
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16230-7
15 Pucciariello C, Voesenek LACJ, Perata P, Sasidharan R. Plant responses to flooding. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00226
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00226
16 Kozlowski TT. Plant Responses to flooding of soil. Bioscience. 1984;34(3):162-7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1309751
https://doi.org/10.2307/1309751
17 Chaudhry S, Sidhu GPS. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: A comprehensive review. Plant Cell Rep. 2022;41(1):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02759-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-021-02759-5
18 Braun DM, Washburn JD, Wood JD. Enhancing the resilience of plant systems to climate change. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(9):2787-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad090
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad090
19 Sarkar J, Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B. High-temperature resilience in Bacillus safensis primed wheat plants: A study of dynamic response associated with modulation of antioxidant machinery, differential expression of HSPs and osmolyte biosynthesis. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;182:104315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104315
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104315
20 Raza A, Wang D, Zou X, Prakash CS. Developing temperature-resilient plants: A matter of present and future concern for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy. 2023;13(4):1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041006
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041006
21 Foyer CH, Kranner I. Plant adaptation to climate change. Biochem J. 2023;480(22):1865-9. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20220580
https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20220580
22 Satyakam, Zinta G, Singh RK, Kumar R. Cold adaptation strategies in plants-An emerging role of epigenetics and antifreeze proteins to engineer cold resilient plants. Front Genet. 2022;13:909007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.909007
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.909007
23 Xiao F, Zhou H. Plant salt response: Perception, signaling, and tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1053699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1053699
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1053699
24 Balasubramaniam T, Shen G, Esmaeili N, Zhang H. Plants’ response mechanisms to salinity stress. Plants. 2023;12(12):2253. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122253
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12122253
25 Hao S, Wang Y, Yan Y, Liu Y, Wang J, Chen S. A review on plant responses to salt stress and their mechanisms of salt resistance. Horticulturae. 2021;7(6):132. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7060132
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7060132
26 Neina D. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl Environ Soil Sci. 2019;2019:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869
27 Shober AL, Wiese C. Preplant soil assessment for new residential landscapes in Florida. EDIS. 2010;2010(4). https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ss534-2010
https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-ss534-2010
28 Zhang J, Li Q, Qi YP, Huang W-L, Yang L-T, Lai N-W, et al. Low pH-responsive proteins revealed by a 2-DE based MS approach and related physiological responses in Citrus leaves. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):188. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1413-3
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1413-3
29 Yakovchenko M, Kosolapova A. Reproduction of soil fertility: Research of physical and chemical characteristics of soils. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2019;403(1):012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/403/1/012036
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/403/1/012036
30 Ferrero AL, Walsh PR, Rajakaruna N. The ecophysiology, genetics, adaptive significance, and biotechnology of nickel hyperaccumulation in plants. In Physiological and Biotechnological Aspects of Extremophiles 2020;(pp. 327-47). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818322-9.00025-3
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818322-9.00025-3
31 Yang Z, Chu C. Towards understanding plant response to heavy metal stress. In Abiotic Stress in Plants – Mechanisms and Adaptations 2011. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/24204
https://doi.org/10.5772/24204
32 Sharma JK, Kumar N, Singh NP, Santal AR. Phytoremediation technologies and their mechanism for removal of heavy metal from contaminated soil: An approach for a sustainable environment. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1076876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1076876
33 Zhang J, Shoaib N, Lin K, Mughal N, Wu X, Sun X, et al. Boosting cadmium tolerance in Phoebe zhennan: The synergistic effects of exogenous nitrogen and phosphorus treatments promoting antioxidant defense and root development. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1340287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1340287
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1340287
34 He M, He CQ, Ding NZ. Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01771
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01771
35 Pandey R, Vengavasi K, Hawkesford MJ. Plant adaptation to nutrient stress. Plant Physiol Rep. 2021;26(4):583-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-021-00636-7
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-021-00636-7
36 Jeong S, Lim CW, Lee SC. The pepper MAP kinase CaAIMK1 positively regulates ABA and drought stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00720
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00720
37 Bartas M. Abiotic stresses in plants: From molecules to environment. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(15):8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158072
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158072
38 Khan F, Siddique AB, Shabala S, Zhou M, Zhao C. Phosphorus plays key roles in regulating plants’ physiological responses to abiotic stresses. Plants. 2023;12(15):2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152861
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152861
39 Kumari VV, Banerjee P, Verma VC, Sukumaran S, Chandran MKS, Gopinath KA, et al. Plant nutrition: An effective way to alleviate abiotic stress in agricultural crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15):8519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23158519
40 Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K. Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2007;32(1):395-419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
